Revert Adding @derek-ho as a maintainer (opensearch-project#1758) #1760
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Stephen Crawford <[email protected]>
stephen-crawford
requested review from
cliu123,
cwperks,
DarshitChanpura,
davidlago,
peternied and
RyanL1997
as code owners
davidlago
approved these changes
Jan 26, 2024
peternied
approved these changes
Jan 26, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is made to revert PR #1758 which added @derek-ho as a maintainer.
While I continue to believe that Derek would be a great maintainer of the project, I was overeager when merging the pull request. The Security and Security Dashboards repositories follow a 1-week "bake" period practice where all nominations for maintainership must wait 1 week before being merged. I was too quick to merge the pull request so unfortunately must revert it.
This is definitely embarrassing on my part but I wanted to correct my mistake.