@@ -1568,9 +1568,6 @@ def test_should_return_valid_decision_after_setting_invalid_delivery_rule_variat
1568
1568
'rule (211127) and user (test_user) in the forced decision map.'
1569
1569
])))
1570
1570
1571
- # TODO - JAE: Can we change the test name and description? Not clear which part is invalid.
1572
- # Also, I see the forced set flag and decide flag is different. Is it intentional?
1573
- # TODO - CHECK WITH JAE if this test should return valid decision like docstring says!
1574
1571
def test_should_return_valid_decision_after_setting_invalid_experiment_rule_variation_in_forced_decision (self ):
1575
1572
"""
1576
1573
Should return valid decision after setting invalid experiment rule variation in forced decision.
@@ -1596,18 +1593,6 @@ def test_should_return_valid_decision_after_setting_invalid_experiment_rule_vari
1596
1593
self .assertEqual (decide_decision .user_context .user_id , 'test_user' )
1597
1594
self .assertEqual (decide_decision .user_context .get_user_attributes (), {})
1598
1595
1599
- # expected_reasons = [
1600
- # 'Evaluating audiences for rule 1: ["11154"].', 'Audiences for rule 1 collectively evaluated to FALSE.',
1601
- # 'User "test_user" does not meet audience conditions for targeting rule 1.',
1602
- # 'Evaluating audiences for rule 2: ["11159"].', 'Audiences for rule 2 collectively evaluated to FALSE.',
1603
- # 'User "test_user" does not meet audience conditions for targeting rule 2.',
1604
- # 'Evaluating audiences for rule Everyone Else: [].',
1605
- # 'Audiences for rule Everyone Else collectively evaluated to TRUE.',
1606
- # 'User "test_user" meets audience conditions for targeting rule Everyone Else.',
1607
- # 'User "test_user" bucketed into a targeting rule Everyone Else.'
1608
- # ]
1609
-
1610
- # TODO - BELOW ARE NEW UPDATED REASONS
1611
1596
expected_reasons = [
1612
1597
'Invalid variation is mapped to flag (test_feature_in_experiment), rule (test_experiment) '
1613
1598
'and user (test_user) in the forced decision map.' ,
0 commit comments