GitHub Community
Announcement & FAQ: Changes to GitHub Copilot Individual Plans #192963
-
Announcement: Changes to GitHub Copilot Individual PlansImportant April 24, 2026: We have updated the main body of this post to answer frequently asked questions. We will continue to edit as more information becomes available. We've recently announced that we’re making the following changes to GitHub Copilot’s Individual plans to protect the experience for existing customers: pausing new sign-ups, tightening usage limits, and adjusting model availability. We know these changes are disruptive, and we want to be clear about why we're making them, and how they will affect you. Here’s what’s changing and why:
For full details on all of the changes and how usage limits work in GitHub Copilot, visit the GitHub Blog: Changes to GitHub Copilot Individual Plans These changes are necessary to ensure we can serve existing customers with a predictable experience. If you hit unexpected limits or these changes just don’t work for you, you can cancel your Pro or Pro+ subscription and receive a refund for the time remaining on your current subscription. ℹ️ Instructions are included in the FAQ below. This discussion may be updated if new information becomes available. Subscribe to receive notifications of any new posts. Caution This community is managed by GitHub employees, but it is not a support forum and there is no SLA or guarantee each post will get a response from a community manager or product leader. We will not permit harassment of other users and GitHub staff. We will remove and posts or comments that violate the Community Code of Conduct and block those accounts from this org. This is consistent with our normal moderation practices. 📌 Frequently Asked Questions1. How to request a refundTo request a refund, go to For more information, visit our docs: About billing for individual GitHub Copilot plans Important The Community Discussions is a public forum, please do not share any personal or billing information like email address, password, or payment information when posting. 2. Can existing customers change plans?While new sign-ups are paused, users with existing plans can still migrate between paid plans.
3. I've hit my seven-day limit - what do I do?Auto will continue to work once you've hit your 7-day limit. We're aware of some errors and are actively investigating those flagged in this thread. Thank you for reporting them. Starting June 1, users will have monthly included usage (just like they do today with PRUs). However, all model usage will incur AI Credit consumption. There are no options to continue using Copilot without waiting for the included usage to reset, enabling additional spend, or upgrading. 4. Why am I hitting rate limits sooner?New rate limits are part of this change, including further restrictions on individual rates. We’re also adding more transparent rate-limit tracking, so it’s easier to see when you’re approaching your limits. We do not have an ETA, yet when this will ship. 5. Why was Opus removed from Copilot Pro?Opus-family models have been removed from Copilot Pro. Rate limits that would be required to keep Opus sustainable on Pro would result in a worse overall experience than using a capable model without those limits. Users would likely hit their cap very quickly. 6. Can I get an exception or workaround?At this time, we’re not able to offer exceptions or workarounds for this change. Copilot Free remains available for signups, and existing users will not be removed. 🎒 GitHub Education and Student Specific Questions7. Why can't I sign up for Copilot Student right now?New signups for Copilot Student are currently paused while we work to provide a more reliable experience for all users. If you already have access, it will remain active. A few important notes:
8. What exactly changed for Education users?These updates apply across Copilot plans, including Education users.
9. I renewed my student coupon early and lost access to Copilot Student. Is that expected?Renewing your student coupon early should not remove your Copilot Student access. If you are having trouble, please contact us. 10. I'm newly eligible for Copilot Student but have never activated it. Can I sign up now?At this time, new activations of Copilot Student, Pro, and Pro+ are paused. Your GitHub Education verification is active and has not been removed. The pause affects the ability to activate Copilot Student or a Copilot paid plan. When signups resume, you will be able to activate the Education benefit if you are still eligible. In the meantime, Copilot Free remains available for signups. We do not have an estimated timeframe to share yet for when the pause will end. Updates will be posted in this discussion post. 🟣 GitHub Pro11. What's the difference between GitHub Pro and Copilot Pro?
12. I have a GitHub Pro plan, does that mean I can upgrade to Copilot Pro/Pro+?
13. I bought a GitHub Pro plan thinking it would enable access to Copilot Pro/Pro+ plans, how do I cancel it?
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 471 comments 534 replies
-
|
so now if i want to use an opus model i have to use the x7.5 xd. big L github. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Git hub go in hell dude |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
ran out of the entirety of my Claude Haiku 4,5 Rate Limit, SUPER early into trying to use Copilot to finish a piece of my Phoenix Point Modding project - twice, first on trying to use Agent for assistance, ran out in a few messages, then just a "chat" asking tips from Claude Haiku - it ran dry after trying to process needing assistance with a rather Complex modding question. all on X1 and for sole reason, of it being a Complex Project when I tried to use Free Plan, expecting a positive Outcome -- and it was "just" reading a large Modding Git as secondary supplement -- nevermind that only thing I actually got, was couple Pseudocode Segments, so those are of VERY limited usefulness, too. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I in first place -- jumped in coz my Deepseek glitched out and lost access to Web Search API, meaning manually poking at the Git pages for larger Mod, only to get duped out like this -- at least it DID manage to make a Pseudocode Stub that was useful to feed to my Deepseek for moving the Project forward |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Very sinecerly FUCK YOU for this! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
At this moment antigravity free plan offers more usage limits than this shit copilot pro drama. utterly a waste of time big L github, first offering a premium service and midway taking away most of the thing just because your potato servers cannot hold the load is disappointing as hell. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
First they removed all the good models from the student plan, now they remove them from the paid plans?? disappointing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I literally moved from a student plan to a paid plan in order to keep using Anthropic's Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.6, look where it got us now... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Right now any of my student plan models are not Working |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I was first getting constant crashing during prompts and now I won't even be able to use the specific models I paid for. Very disappointed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
my student plan copilot pro downgraded to free plan any one has this issues? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@jaisonjsamuel458-web I was on a trial of Copilot Pro that should have switched to monthly billing around the 2nd of this month. However, it appears they didn't bill me, and now I'm stuck on free. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
very disappointing! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is so outrageous and insane that it borders on abuse. Imagine offering a product and, halfway through, while you're PAYING, they remove your already expensive product—you've already spent a lot—and you still don't have access to it anymore. It's utter nonsense. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is so bad. I didn't realize it also impacted people who already prepaid for a year subscription. This is a really bad look. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Imagine this is done on day one of the subscription. You are promises a month of X and then on the first day you only get Y. And then you get told "you can always cancel it if you don't like it". Yeah. That's the bare minimum and borders on false advertising. Oh well it was probably covered on page 461 of some TOS. If you struggle then do a batter job at communicating changes. I don't need to ask an AI that tells me to go here to see its gone all tits up. You have the channels to let people know this better. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Agreed. I was also thinking that I probably made a mistake of not opting to purchase the yearly subscription before hand expecting the new policy shouldn't be affecting the agreements and contracts made before the change. Thats how it should be. This is purely a breach of contract, isn't it? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Agreed, as a solo dev, copilot pro was a very good, cheap, and useful product. Alongside the frustration of these new awsome rate limits, I've also lost the most useful model. (yay). I'm not paying microsoft $40 just because they could not be bothered to use some of their billions to keep the service going, and people happy. Nope. Wonder what their PR team is going to do about this. I suppose I might as well try and get a good gpu and go local..... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as disruptive content.
This comment was marked as disruptive content.
-
|
Yep... I saw this coming, but it's disappointing to see you soft-deprecating the service to nudge us towards the door. I suppose per-request billing wasn't profitable... The line « If you hit unexpected limits or these changes just don't work for you, you can cancel your Pro or Pro+ subscription and you will not be charged for April usage. » makes the manoeuvre rather obvious… Time to give Claude Code another go! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yeah, and the replies from the GitHub community admin above are seriously tone deaf. 🙈 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I really liked Copilot, and even though I have a paid subscription to Claude, I preferred to use Copilot as it is flexible enough and allows you to change models. This is a kick in the nuts. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Last week I notice the Personally I'd like to see it. I'd just rather they just rip the band aid off rather than the slow push out the door. 
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
🤔 How close are we from seeing the "Max" subscription plan. I am seriously considering refunding my github copilot pro+ subscriptions and switching to Claude 200$ plan but I am holding back in hope to see a better deal from microsoft. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Based on their recent moves, my guess is that the Max plan might just be the experience you already have with the old Pro+, at a higher price. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
since that case u should add chinese models xd |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
点了 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
nowhere near enough to keep paying. i have a year sub that i converted to pro+ and this bs about the weekly token cap is clearly BAIT-AND-SWITCH. why TF would I pay microsoft/github $40/month for something I get free or $10/month (minimax, glm, qwen, etc). minimax has been far more stable than anthropic or copilot. there are already many models that beat opus 4.6 on avg benchmarks, and as you all know opus is widely seen as king. (it isn't though. pull up pinchbench dot com and click to sort by avg score, which if you are intelligent it is immediately obvious why that matters more than the outlier "best ever" that happened on that one test one time. notice how many beat opus. (currently 3 but this varies)) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
And where do you pay 10 dollars to access these Chinese models? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Also interested |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
You can access some of those models through tools like Ollama and OpenCode Go, and if you use Z.ai’s GLM 5.1, the pricing can be very reasonable for the amount of work you get out of it. In my case, with a heavy multi-subagent workflow, I can usually push it close to the limit and still get a lot of usable time before the 5-hour reset window. Most people will probably never hit that level of usage, so for average users it can stretch quite a bit further. I bought the yearly Pro plan for around $145 back in December, and last I checked it looked closer to $180. I locked it in early because I suspected the price would go up later. As for the model quality, I would compare GLM more to the Sonnet 4.5 style of model behavior. Earlier versions felt closer to that, and while they can sometimes get a bit verbose, they are still genuinely useful models to work with. I have not yet put 5.1 through my longest workflows, so I would not overstate that part yet, but the early results are promising. OpenCode and Ollama also make these models easier to test, but the real answer is still the same: do the math for your own workflow. That is what matters most. Pricing only looks good or bad once you measure it against how many hours of real work you can actually get out of it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I fully understand the need to make changes like these (although I disagree with the way it was done). That being said, the BIGGEST issue I have is not the fact that Opus 4.7 costs 7.5x but the fact that it's only on MEDIUM THINKING. Not only is 4.7 a serious regression to 4.5 and 4.6 but as a Max user on CC, I never run Opus on medium thinking as it's just a complete waste of tokens. Use Opus with High or Max and Sonnet for anything else. I would highly suggest the team enable High mode for 4.7 on Copilot... that's the least they could do. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Deleting 4.5/4.6 opus models, its because they actually working, and now they want you to pay more and more money for something that actually working, I guess me and most of others dont really need the 4.7 model, because 4.6 doing the work fine, so why they deleted the 4.5/4.6 opus models, because they want force you pay more and more money for something that actually working 4.7 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Great analysis, That's exactly how I would put it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Remover o Opus é um tiro no pé... Ao menos para mim, pois com a exclusão deles para meu plano (PRO +), me vem à pergunta, vale a pena continuar usando o github, ou vale a pena migrar diretamente pra Claude? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This is tremendously terrible behaviour GH. Nothing more than a money grab once again, we are already paying 3X the tokens for the model and do so sparingly. Why would you make this an incremental cost on your side? We know its possible because we were already using it. Big Thumbs Down from an org based on enablement for all. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
An organisation owned by one of the most evil companies on earth, none other than everybody's favourite, Microsoft. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It feels like this plane is being repaired mid-flight. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It feels like the plane is being repaired while burning on the ground... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
it feels like the plane was fine, but the staff decided to sabotage it anyway |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Feels like the "copilot" just doesn't feel like it and opens the door mid-flight. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This bait-and-switch is completely unacceptable. You silently killed Opus 4.6 which completely broke my agent coding workflows and CLI tasks right when I needed them most. First you stripped the student access, then you introduced opaque hourly + weekly rate limits that just making the AUTO model throw 401 token expired errors, and now we are suddenly expected to pay $40/month!!!! just to get a restricted 4.7 locked on medium thinking? We subscribed for a reliable dev tool, not a rug pull. If your infrastructure can't handle the load, don't sell the tier. :D |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This forum feels like you're screaming into the wind and no one at GitHub / Microsoft is listening. I wrote a breakdown on exactly how this 'rug pull' put profits above our productivity. Microsoft doesn't have a compute problem; they have a trust problem that they manufactured. Here's why we need to move to a BYOK (Bring Your Own Key) model to protect our productivity: https://cabeza.cc/the-copilot-rug-pull-when-tech-giants-lobotomize-your-workflow/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@anjeleno do the math first. even with the updated pricing MS/GH are definitely not getting any profit off of copilot and still subsidize it. but hey - go for it. cancel your Pro, try BYOK and tell us how much you saved |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@psimsa I have... Before I make any final decision, I'm waiting to see if Microsoft reverses course. If I do rip off the band-aid, I'll gladly share the BYOK math once the migration is done, but you're missing the point. It isn't just about trying to save $10 a month; it's about predictable performance. Right now, losing the unthrottled reasoning of Opus 4.6 and being forced to burn tokens 2.5x faster (jumping from a 3x to a 7.5x multiplier) for a degraded, "Medium thinking" model just isn't worth the price of the subscription. Whether Microsoft is taking a loss on compute or not, silently rug-pulling your paying users isn't the solution. Honesty and transparency should still matter. In the meantime, considering reactivating my Cursor subscription and finding other workarounds to get reliable access to the models I've built workflows around and have come to depend on. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
And yet, Microsoft is just removing a popular, well used service. Great idea. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
YouTube streamers and other social media users will love this. The free service itself is already a complete mess, and doing what they're doing out of pure greed will only make things worse. They're just going to create more material to publish and gain views. Now the service is really going down the drain. lol |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
What are the exact limits for session and weekly usage? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
They will not tell you because else its hard to "tweak" them, aka tighten the limits even more without you noticing ... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Unless I was unlucky with recent 2-3 requests (although it was gpt5.4 medium so should eat like 1-2% max), or github being slow (both possible) I think they reduced the total number of requests as well. I have been at ~60-70% and im at 80%. MAYBE I AM INCORRECT. BUT. Without any number from GitHub I WILL assume I am correct and pretend to be angry, while looking for alternative. Google at least has balls to show you all the graphs of your usage. Here? I can only trust that they are not doing anything, while staring at "%" |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
My case (after 3 weeks of 1-5 hours per day), this started happening yesterday: 
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I got two requests in and I was rate limited for 5 hours on my Pro account. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Removed Github Student Pack -> People transfered to Github Copilot Pro (Free trials) -> Paused all free trials -> People who were still going to pay afterwards upgrades to Github Copilot Pro -> Removes the top models (Opus 4.5 & Opus 4.6) that most people used from Github Copilot Pro -> ALSO removes/replace Opus 4.5 & Opus 4.6 with Opus 4.7 with more than double the request cost on the more expensive plan... Github, this is as anti-consumer as you can possibly get within the span of a few weeks. I get you might be losing a bit of money, but straight up removing and replacing the models and plans that people are using/paying for is a dumb move. There are guaranteed tons of people that will 100% cancel their subscription and move to Claude or OpenAI's plans instead. The main reason I used Github Copilot Pro was because you provided the top Claude models in VS Code with simple integration along with other models such as GPT 5.4. However, removing that also removes peoples incentive to continue their subscription. Why would people not just pay Claude and use their Claude Code with integrated SKILL marketplace and a bunch of useful features instead? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
this is literally what happend to me |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yeah this is bullshit, been paying $200/month in overage charges on my Pro account. And they just up and kill it. Sure hope DeepSeek 4 is as good as they are promising. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Because CC is trash.. but you wanna use Opus model |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That's nuts, I'm Pro + subscriber and my task was corrupted in middle of the flight. What are you doing???? You removed most usable model for what? for Opus 4.7 which cost almost 3 times more that Opus 4.6, do you think I'm an idiot, I won't pay another round for that just because you want me to pay for that. that's insane you broke my work and orchestration and now you want me to pay more for this kind of service. No way I will do that. Thank for service. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
How big is the context window for Opus 4.7? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
192k Tokens. Same as 4.6 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
What other alternatives do we have? Do you think is worth it to pay the max plan from Claude? I am afraid that the usage limits there will be tricky as well, since a lot of users there are just complaining. The thing is that is cost $100, far more than copilot pro+. Any thoughts? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I am in a simliar situation like you are. First shocked and angry. Now I also consider other options. My first try was to use other models in Copilot. It seemed to be like in early times. I wanted to change coding logic (Flutter) and gave the same instructions to other models. Nothing felt like Opus 4.6. But I cannot compare anymore. I just find Gemini 3.1 Pro nice to use. Additionally I installed Codex today. May be more people can write their ways too. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Anthropic is good but expensive. First of all you don't always need those top models. Use the right model for the right task. Optimize your agents, skills, rules, context etc. to get the best results with the least amount of tokens. There are some good models that come close to the Claude's for a fraction of the costs, so you have a choice. Of course your employers should pay for the right tooling. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
A very stupid decision !! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yeah, see this, straight from the horse's mouth: https://messagebase.net/Read/6346/wow-visual-studio-202x-is-a-dead-product |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
They're doing better than ever financially |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Where can I see those usage limits? I can only see # of premium requests which is useless anyways as usage limits prevents one from getting to 1500 premium requests anyway. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
You CANNOT use your monthly limits this way. Just 3 hours in, and I've already used my weekly limit? Are you serious github? I used only 22 premium requests today. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
|
Just got the mail and see the finial official blog GitHub Copilot is moving to usage-based billing Now, we're token plan era now |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
i will use deepseek from this now, as i heard it is not bad |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
yes, I tried deepseek v4 pro on a task with detailed design doc, it performs similar to sonnet 4.6. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
it is ridiculous I subscribed the annual plan, and you suddenly raise the multiplier by 6 times! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Finally, somebody with some perspective decided to do the obvious. https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/github-copilot-is-moving-to-usage-based-billing Thank you for ending this charade. Why not announce the obvious solution to all your problems straight away instead of this "changes to copilot plans", why the tedious detour into pissing off lots of customers via all these intermediate steps. What a PR fiasco. Should have just said straight away = some people are pulling off massive tasks via 1 "premium" request and gaming the system. Now, if you could also deal with this little side effect of your process of self-discovery I would appreciate it very much. https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/194110#discussioncomment-16728163 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's just humorous that, in their documents, Opus 4.7 costs 3x Premium Request, while they charge people 7.5x. Edit: I should have a screenshot of proof: 2nd Edit: Nice cover-up! Good luck continuing to sabotage the reputation built over the years in one single month. (It's REALLY REASONABLE AND RATIONALE when you are GOING TO charge the same 27x for Opus 4.6 & 4.7, but decide "Hey, let's charge 4.7 more" before. It's NOT OBVIOUS AT ALL that the Opus 4.7 raise was a greedy move. NO PROGRAMMER WOULD BE SMART ENOUGH TO TELL THIS. Cause they are just nerds who know nothing about being ripped off when you play the sales games, even if the games hurt their trust and their daily-driven productivity tool. It would be absolutely fine.) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
They wanted to test the waters on individual users before announcing this to business users... and see if they could get away with double dipping users for premium requests and token usage. Obviously didn't work out well for them so they decided to drop premium requests quota altogether. The new blog post still doesn't mention rate limits though, which I assume will remain in place... effectively making copilot completely useless. I switched to $100/month codex and it's been incredible compared to what GHCP has been for the past 2 months. I tried out the $20/month codex plan but it doesn't allow enough usage for my needs... but at least the rate limits are visible to the user. I doubt I'll come back to copilot since they can't seem to ever make the JetBrains plugin's on par with the other ones and I'm definitely never going to use vs code. Another massive L for Microsoft on this one. It was entertaining watching them destroy their business in real time though. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I really wish they would allow us to use locally hosted models to save money. Still charge us a monthly fee and offload some of the inference to our local hardware. That would be a solution. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's basically just a farce. They are changing terms everywhere after the fact, starting ignoring support tickets that show them what was available at time of writing and just try to cover up whatever they tried to do here. And they somehow seem to think people are too dumb to notice. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
For those punies in charge of this, by refusing the chance to lose money, you also give up the possibility of gain. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Theres enough privilege out there that this gate keeping move will simply kick us regular people out of the loop so the rich can CONTINUE to be the only ones making stuff and making money from the stuff they make. Its sick and snobby. Train on all our activity and data and then make it so we cant afford to use what they built from our decades of data and activity... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
the thing about class action suites is that it's better to copy one than join one. this vendor can afford many! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I Man why would you give us 300 monthly credits if you cant even use like 10% of that?? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I got the email |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Absolutely!!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I am trying to setup Continue (VS Code extension) on my pi5 16GB and have it partially functioning but I can't get plan or agent working properly. I feel like the least GitHub could do in good faith is help us with alternatives (Gemini is worthless). I have used my entire month of free credits on free which is where I landed after the system seems to degrade from accepting payment to downgrading a little every time I looked on another page until I landed on free some how. If I can continue with my workflow and just use local AI I can keep working and I feel like that would be a reason to keep the GitHub pro. A little help? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I got one of those too... but no..i cannot help because i havent even tried vs code on it. Sorry bro. Just wanted to let you know i have one too because of camaraderie lol |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
What is the conceptual difference between PRUs and AI Credits? It sounds like basically the same thing by a different name. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Credits are token based I guess. Although they didn't mention how the residuals are going to be dealt with. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
yo, do'em dirty too!
personally I have successfully set up Continue and Cline with my local
Ollama instance running Qwen 3.6, and the performance is fantastic. seems
very comparable to what Opus 4.5 was. if you know how to 'shake off' n NOT
drip in ur pantz.
At this point, I believe local execution is the most viable and valuable
path forward. It seems best to handle the primary workload locally and
perhaps use cloud services only for final reviews if you maintain a
subscription. good luck goyyou got this!
…On Mon, Apr 27, 2026, 3:44 p.m. Richard Gates ***@***.***> wrote:
I am trying to setup Continue (VS Code extension) on my pi5 16GB and have
it partially functioning but I can't get plan or agent working properly. I
feel like the least GitHub could do in good faith is help us with
alternatives (Gemini is worthless). I have used my entire month of free
credits on free which is where I landed after the system seems to degrade
from accepting payment to downgrading a little every time I looked on
another page until I landed on free some how. If I can continue with my
workflow and just use local AI I can keep working and I feel like that
would be a reason to keep the GitHub pro. A little help?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#192963 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BUVCDHFZO4QZZ7VWRBIXKY34X7IDBAVCNFSM6AAAAACX5NR4OWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTMNZTGQ3DIMI>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/github-copilot-is-moving-to-usage-based-billing/ See the new multiplier. Switched to chatgpt pro. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Oh my god, the frontier models have a x5 to x9 multiplied increase of the initial multiplier, Github really are losing money with this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I knew it. They are switching to cater to big business and the rich and privileged. Good luck to anyone who couldnt afford to go to college but was able to learn and work with ai. Hope you built local tools and got your hands on the chinese models and built your own agents.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
and others
🆕 Community Manager Update: April 23, 2026
We've updated the main post to include a consolidated FAQ covering common questions about refunds, plan changes and eligibility, rate limits, model availability, and the current pause on new Copilot plan signups (including Education). Please review the updated section above for details.
Caution
We will not permit harassment of other users and GitHub staff. We will remove and posts or comments that violate the Community Code of Conduct and block those accounts from this org. This is consistent with our normal moderation practices.