Best way to cite OpenDSSDirect.jl package in a paper?

[Realife-Brahmin]

Sorry if this question is already answered somewhere else (likely). I'd like to cite ODD.jl as that's what I use to verify my power distribution system optimization simulations (I also regularly use ODD.py but not for the paper I'm currently gonna be submitting).
For now, I'm going with a generic citation, using the repo page's citation generated using Bib it now! firefox extension:

@misc{BibEntry2025Mar,
	title = {{OpenDSSDirect.jl}},
	journal = {GitHub},
	year = {2025},
	month = mar,
	note = {[Online; accessed 9. Mar. 2025]},
	url = {https://github.com/dss-extensions/OpenDSSDirect.jl}
}

Would be more than happy to change it to a more appropriate citation which gives credit to the brilliant people maintaining it.

[PMeira]

@Realife-Brahmin Thanks for citing us.

I think that's good enough, either the repo or the doc site for a specific version, e.g. https://dss-extensions.org/OpenDSSDirect.jl/v0.9.9/

There is some general discussion at https://discourse.julialang.org/t/how-to-cite-julia-packages-for-academic-purpose/80124/9 and some packages could be useful, e.g. https://github.com/SebastianM-C/PkgCite.jl

ODD.py has a CITATION.cff file, so it should generate the "Cite this repository" link. I guess it's better for us to add explicit CITATION.bib files too; there's an open issue related to that already, so it'll get handled eventually.