Future Compatibility with IPLD Storage #4
0xc0de4c0ffee
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
This is good to keep in mind on the side. I will remind myself of IPLD's technicals again. It will perhaps matter when building the IPNS service for the records manager client, which could also double as IPLD service, ?if I am not mistaken. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Our current offchain records resolver is designed to be backwards compatible with IPNS+IPFS, so we've to make sure that we don't break IPNS+IPLD patterns for future.. it'll be lot easier to manage json records with IPLD compared to IPFS/..json files as "Linked Data". We've to write that as next ENSIP to simplify dynamic dweb designs OR fully depend on IPNS+IPLD specs.
Old Scratch pad using js-ipfs in browser :
https://codepen.io/0xc0de4c0ffee/pen/eYLPVJp
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions