Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SRD/BNB take effective_value as argument instead of utxo #43

Open
yancyribbens opened this issue Mar 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

SRD/BNB take effective_value as argument instead of utxo #43

yancyribbens opened this issue Mar 18, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@yancyribbens
Copy link
Collaborator

Both SRD and BNB compute the effective value of each utxo independently. There's not reason to pass each the utxo only so that the effective value can be computed. Instead pass only what the sorting algorithm needs.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Feature/coin struct yancyribbens/rust-bitcoin-coin-selection
1 participant
@yancyribbens