Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Expand whois to Include Non-Nominated Validators/Nodes #836

Open
GeoScobie opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@GeoScobie
Copy link

Hi team,

First off, thank you for building and maintaining the polkadot-introspector tool! It’s been a great way for me to query and geopopulate active validators, and the whois functionality has been particularly useful for retrieving the active validator set and wallet addresses.

I’m curious if it would make sense to expand the whois functionality to include validators and nodes that are not currently nominated. This could provide a more comprehensive view of the network and be useful for analysis and monitoring purposes.

I’d appreciate any insight into:

Whether this is already possible within the current tool.

  1. If not, how feasible it might be to implement such functionality.
  2. Any guidance on where in the codebase this could be explored.
  3. This could be a great addition for researchers and developers alike, and I’d be happy to test or contribute if needed!

Thanks for considering this, and looking forward to your thoughts.

Best regards,
Rob

@sandreim
Copy link
Collaborator

cc @AndreiEres

@Polkadot-Forum
Copy link

This issue has been mentioned on Polkadot Forum. There might be relevant details there:

https://forum.polkadot.network/t/expanding-polkadot-introspector-whois-functionality/11500/2

@AndreiEres
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello, thank you for opening the issue.

If you'd like to explore the codebase, all the whois functionality is located in the whois folder.

I would appreciate a few examples of where you need this functionality and what information you require.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants