Should skip branch name checking for empty repo?

[MaxymVlasov]

It's for possibility create Initial commit in any branch.

But how about "fixes" for Initial commit? Looks as not very good flow.

[dzirg44]

I found 2 workaround to avoid this bug.

1. When i create repository i must to create README.md , .gitignore etc. also, i think it will be work but it looks not good for me.
2. Adding interactive question 'do you really want to commit in the master branch' because i can in any moment disable this webhook.

In the git workflow have 'Hot fixs' and we can use it to push to the master branch without create any branch and merge. Only owner can makes this push.

I think disable all features is not a right way because when i created the sample repository without master branch i can create branch which will be 'default' if the other branch have not be define, after that i cannot delete this branch and only Manuel can do it.
👍 thank you for your help

[MaxymVlasov]

No longer relevant, see #31 (comment)