Merge upstream or push features to upstream

[MartyWind]

Hi there,
I quite like the theme and the changes made to Mainroad.
However the development of Mainroad continues and here it does not.

Would you consider merging upstream?
Bringing the features of this theme to upstream would be even better and you would not have to invest the time maintaining :)

Greetings

[mxmehl]

Thanks for the proposal. I'm afraid we already diverged too much. This theme really is specific to the DPSG layout and the work to integrate this into upstream is not bearable for me time-wise. Also, I'm not sure changes such as 100% local assets are actually wanted upstream, but that's mandatory for the reference implementation of this theme. Would it have been better to put more work into upstream before starting this fork? Certainly.

PRs like #10 increase the gap once again which is why I'm unsure how to handle it.

However, we could sync with upstream again, which may involve resolving some merge conflicts. But again, my time for this project is very limited, but I'd be happy to review a PR.

[MartyWind]

@mxmehl That's understandable.
I could help with integrating those features once it stands that I will use this theme for my next project (a township in northern germany). But I would split them, to test, review and merge them separately. Merging a big "feature dump" is not a good idea in my opinion.

[mxmehl]

Absolutely, good idea. I hope you will get this next project ;)