Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update external-secrets docker tag to v0.14.3 #6380

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 26, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
external-secrets minor 0.10.4 -> 0.14.3

Release Notes

external-secrets/external-secrets (external-secrets)

v0.14.3

Compare Source

Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.14.3
Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.14.3-ubi
Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.14.3-ubi-boringssl

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: external-secrets/external-secrets@v0.14.2...v0.14.3

v0.14.2

Compare Source

Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.14.2
Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.14.2-ubi
Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.14.2-ubi-boringssl

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: external-secrets/external-secrets@v0.14.1...v0.14.2

v0.14.1

Compare Source

Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.14.1
Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.14.1-ubi
Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.14.1-ubi-boringssl

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: external-secrets/external-secrets@v0.14.0...v0.14.1

v0.14.0

Compare Source

Potential Breaking Change

Stateful Generators have been introduced with:

While normally this isn't a problem, external secrets controller and push secrets controller have been changed.

If any normal operation that should work encounters a problem, please don't hesitate to open an issue. Please also include that the problem appeared after switching to this version. Thank you!

Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.14.0
Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.14.0-ubi
Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.14.0-ubi-boringssl

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: external-secrets/external-secrets@v0.13.0...v0.14.0

v0.13.0

Compare Source

Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.13.0
Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.13.0-ubi
Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.13.0-ubi-boringssl

BREAKING CHANGES

https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/pull/4262 introduces a breaking change in the METADATA structure for the AWS PARAMETER STORE.

The old metadata structure changed to this new structure described here: https://external-secrets.io/latest/provider/aws-parameter-store/#additional-metadata-for-pushsecret

It looks like this:

metadata:
        apiVersion: kubernetes.external-secrets.io/v1alpha1
        kind: PushSecretMetadata
        spec:
          secretType: SecureString
          kmsKeyID: bb123123-b2b0-4f60-ac3a-44a13f0e6b6c
          tier:
            type: Advanced # default is Standard
            policies:
              - type: "Expiration"
                version: "1.0"
                attributes:
                  timestamp: "2024-12-02T21:34:33.000Z"
              - type: "ExpirationNotification"
                version: "1.0"
                attributes:
                  before: "2"
                  unit: "Days"
              - type: "ExpirationNotification"
                version: "1.0"
                attributes:
                  before: "30"
                  unit: "Days"
              - type: "NoChangeNotification"
                version: "1.0"
                attributes:
                  after: "30"
                  unit: "Days"

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: external-secrets/external-secrets@v0.12.1...v0.13.0

v0.12.1

Compare Source

RELEASE VERSION

My apologies, when creating the release, 0.12.0 failed. The branch and tag however, have been created and I was unable to delete them. Thus, the version has been increased to 0.12.1 after the fix and now that's the current version. I hand updated the release notes to include everyone into the changes.

BREAKING CHANGES

The following breaking changes have been introduced into this release:

  • Permission update for AWS provider adding BulkFetch when getting multiple secrets ( significant API reduce but comes with adding a permission for bulk endpoint )
  • fixed a typo for a generator in the json tag where before it was ecrRAuthorizationTokenSpec with an extra R
  • We standardized the GCP Secrets Manager Metadata structure for PushSecrets ( be aware that existing manifests will stop working until updated to the standardized version ) for more info see https://github.com/external-secrets/external-secrets/pull/4210

Images

Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.12.1
Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.12.1-ubi
Image: ghcr.io/external-secrets/external-secrets:v0.12.1-ubi-boringssl

What's Changed


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Signed-off-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@renovate renovate bot added dependency/docker Dependency Docker kind/renovate Categorizes issue or PR as related to Renovate lifecycle/active Indicates that an issue or PR is actively being worked on by a contributor. priority/medium This issue or PR may be useful, and needs some attention size/xs Size XS status/review_needed The issue or PR needs to be reviewed labels Feb 26, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nlamirault nlamirault closed this Feb 26, 2025
@dosubot dosubot bot added the dependencies label Feb 26, 2025
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/external-secrets-0.x branch February 26, 2025 15:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependency/docker Dependency Docker kind/renovate Categorizes issue or PR as related to Renovate lifecycle/active Indicates that an issue or PR is actively being worked on by a contributor. priority/medium This issue or PR may be useful, and needs some attention size/xs Size XS status/review_needed The issue or PR needs to be reviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant