This seems like a bug/oversight. Text captured in the <acqinfo> field (see docs) is not currently getting indexed in a way where a keyword search will find it. That field might include, e.g., the name of a donor in which case it would be valuable for staff/users to be able to search for that name.
From the schema.xml file it looks like <acqinfo> was intended to be captured as a searchable note.
<copyField source="acqinfo_tesim" dest="text" />
But the current traject rules do not have acqinfo getting captured as _tesim (only _ssim). One possible fix would be to add acqinfo to the SEARCHABLE_NOTES_FIELDS array in the collection & component traject configs.
This seems like a bug/oversight. Text captured in the
<acqinfo>field (see docs) is not currently getting indexed in a way where a keyword search will find it. That field might include, e.g., the name of a donor in which case it would be valuable for staff/users to be able to search for that name.From the
schema.xmlfile it looks like<acqinfo>was intended to be captured as a searchable note.But the current traject rules do not have
acqinfogetting captured as_tesim(only_ssim). One possible fix would be to addacqinfoto theSEARCHABLE_NOTES_FIELDSarray in the collection & component traject configs.