Merge pull request #55 from Carreau/practicalities

Start working on the practicalities section.

Author: Carreau

Diff for: .gitignore

@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 _site/
-.DS_Store
+.DS_Store
+*.swo

Diff for: _config.yml

@@ -35,4 +35,5 @@ colors:
 
 collections:
 - sections
+- practicalities
 

Diff for: _includes/css/base.css

@@ -274,7 +274,16 @@
   width:90%;
 }
 
-.highlight pre, .highlight code { display:block; margin:0; padding:0; background: none; overflow:auto; word-wrap: normal; }
+.highlight pre, .highlight code { 
+    display:block;
+    margin:0;
+    padding:0;
+    background:
+    none;
+    overflow:auto;
+    word-wrap: normal; 
+    white-space: pre;
+}
 
 .highlight, .linenodiv {
   background-image: url();

Diff for: _includes/css/main.css

@@ -25,6 +25,16 @@ html { box-sizing: border-box; }
   #{{id}} .sectiondivider { color: {{ bg }}; }
 {% endfor %}
 
+{% for node in site.practicalities %}
+  {% capture id %}{{ node.id | remove:'/' | downcase }}{% endcapture %}
+  {% capture bg %}{% if site.colors[node.bg] %}{{ site.colors[node.bg] }}{% else %}{{ node.bg }}{% endif %}{% endcapture %}
+  {% capture fg %}{% if site.colors[node.color] %}{{ site.colors[node.color] }}{% else %}{{ node.color }}{% endif %}{% endcapture %}
+  nav .p-{{id}} { border-color: {{ bg }}; }
+  #{{id}} { background-color: {{ bg }} !important; color: {{ fg }}; }
+  #{{id}} a { color: {{ fg }}; }
+  #{{id}} .sectiondivider { color: {{ bg }}; }
+{% endfor %}
+
 
 /* ----- code, syntax highlighting, etc ----- */
 

Diff for: _practicalities/intro.md

@@ -0,0 +1,352 @@
+---
+bg: '#4da45e'
+color: white
+title: practicalities
+fa-icon: pencil
+id: bar
+---
+
+We do not discourage authors to release software on Python 2. While this guide
+is mostly written with the assumption that software are going to stop Python 2
+support, it does perfectly apply to a package that wish to not support Python 3,
+or is stopping support for any minor version. 
+
+
+This page gather information and links to resources allowing to release a
+library that stop supporting an older version of Python without causing too
+much disruption for users who haven't upgraded to this new version.
+
+Whether you are a user, or a developer, being aware of the issue listed here, at
+least the main points should ease lots of the pain.
+
+# Too long, did not read:
+
+ - Help and encourage users to install **pip 9.0+**
+ - Help and encourage users to install **setuptools 24.3+**
+ - As maintainer use `setup(..., python_requires='>=3.4')` new option.
+ - do use `pip install [-e] .` and do **not** invoke `setup.py` directly.
+ - **Fail** early at **install time** if on Python 2.
+ - We are giving a talk at PyCon 2017 (likely recorded), add link here. 
+
+## The problem
+
+Up until December 2016 it was hard to publish a new major version of library
+that changed requirements in Python version and mark it as such so that user
+system will not try to upgrade said library.
+
+With the recent changes in Python packaging this is now possible.
+
+As an example let's look at the example of the `fictitious` library.
+
+- `fictitious` 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 are compatible Python 2.7 and 3.3+
+- `fictitious` 2.0 has been released and is python 3.4+ only.
+
+As a Python 2.7 user, if I don't pay attention, or if the library is not
+correctly tagged, if I issue the following:
+
+    $ python -c 'import fictitious; print(fictitious.__version__)'
+    1.3.2
+    $ pip install fiction --upgrade
+
+Either my system will install 2.0, which will not work, on the worst case
+scenario, or fail to install, in which case I will not get the critical 1.4
+upgrade.
+
+## As a user
+
+### Install Pip 9.0
+
+If you are already a Python 3 user, you should not encounter a lot of
+disruption. Please still check that the libraries you use follow best practices
+not to break for Python 2 users. Python is a community regardless of which
+python version you have to (or decided to) run, making sure that everything
+works make the community strong.
+
+Make sure you have Pip >= 9.0, this is especially important if you have Python
+2 installations. Having pip 9.0+ is not a guaranty to flawless upgrade. But pip
+9.0+ does have a number of safety check not available on previous versions.
+
+Having a version of pip < 9.0 can lead your system to try to upgrade to
+non-compatible versions of Python packages even if these are marked as
+non-compatible.
+
+Help as many other _users_ as possible to install pip >=9.0, for the
+transition, it is the slowest part of the ecosystem to update, and is the only
+piece that requires action of all Python users.
+
+The simplest way to make sure all is up to date is to run the following for
+each installation of Python:
+
+    $ pip install --upgrade setuptools pip
+
+This will install the latest version of pip and setuptools.
+
+You can issue the following to see the version of pip:
+
+   $ pip --version
+   9.0.0
+
+All good.
+
+
+
+## Setuptools
+
+If you are on a system  for which no wheel is available, pip will try to
+install a source distribution (aka `sdist`).
+
+Installing an `sdist` will require setuptools make sure you have setuptools
+`>=24.2.0` or building Python 3 only libraries is likely to fail. In particular
+if library authors have taken time to mark their library as Python 3 only, the
+`python_requires` argument to `setup()` may not be recognized and installation
+will fail.
+
+Use the following to check setuptools version :
+
+    $ python -c 'import setuptools; print(setuptools.__version__)
+    24.2.0
+
+Again make sure to upgrade pip and setuptools to make sure you have an up to
+date system:
+
+    $ pip install --upgrade setuptools pip
+
+## Local package index
+
+If you are using a custom local package index, for example if you are working
+at a company with private packages, make sure it implement correctly
+[pep-503](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0503/) and let pip knows about
+the `python_requires` field. This _mostly_ mean that the html you are exposing
+should get a `data-python-requires` data attribute with the (html escaped)
+version specifier.
+
+## The state of PyPI
+
+Note that at the time of this writing the patches to `pypi.python.org` are not
+deployed yet but should hopefully be deployed soon.
+
+[Warehouse](https://github.com/pypi/warehouse) and [Legacy
+PyPI](https://github.com/pypa/legacy-pypi) have received various patches to
+insure they support this new functionality.
+
+# Preparing your library
+
+
+As a library author one of the most important factor in a smooth transition is
+planning and communication, letting your user base know in advance that the
+transition is happening and what step to take is critical for a transition.
+
+For your library code here the steps you need to take to ensure that
+installation will fail in the least number of case:
+
+You need to release your new packages version with
+[setuptools](https://pypi.python.org/pypi/setuptools) version 24.2.0 or above.
+You can also use one of the alternate package manager that can set the
+[Requires-Python](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0345/#requires-python)
+metadata field. Without this, pip 9.0 **will try** to install non-compatible
+version of your software on Python 2. This version of setuptools is recent
+(July 20, 2016) and this possible thank to the [work of Xavier
+Fernandez](https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/pull/631)
+
+Add the following to your `setup.py`
+
+```
+setup(
+   ...
+   python_requires='>=3.3'
+   ...
+)
+```
+
+Change `>=3.3` accordingly depending on what version your library decides to
+support. In particular you can use `>=2.6` or `>=3.5` ! Note that this also
+support the _compable with_ syntax: `~=2.5` (meaning, `>=2.5` and `<3`).
+
+This will make [PyPI aware](https://github.com/pypa/warehouse/pull/1448) that
+your package is Python 3.3+ only, and [allow
+pip](https://github.com/pypa/pip/pull/3877) to be [made aware of
+this](https://github.com/pypa/pypi-legacy/pull/506).
+
+Thus as long as your user have recent enough versions of pip and setuptools
+they will get the right version of your library.
+
+# Unit Testing and documentation
+
+It is recommended **not** to invoke `setup.py` directly either with `install` or
+`develop` subcommands. These may not correctly resolve dependencies, and can
+install incompatible versions of dependencies. Please recommend and use `pip
+install . `  and `pip install -e .` for regular and developer install.
+
+Check in scripts, and documentation that the correct installation command is
+used. 
+
+# Recommended Mitigations
+
+These are not mandatory but should make the transition seamless by warning your
+user early enough _and_ providing useful error messages.
+
+## Runtime warning on master
+
+Add a warning at _runtime_ early on master (before switching to Python 3
+  only)
+
+```
+import warnings
+import sys
+if sys.version_info < (3,):
+    warnings.warn('You are using master of `Frobulator` with Python 2. '
+                  'Frobulator will soon be Python 3 only. '
+                  'See this issue to know more.',
+                  UserWarning)
+```
+
+Your Python 2 user have a chance to upgrade, or get off master, (for example on
+the LTS branch).
+
+## Fail early at import time
+
+Add an error early at import at runtime with a clear error message, leave the
+early import compatible Python 2 for users to not be welcomed with a useless
+`SyntaxError`. Don't hesitate to use multi-line strings in error messages.
+
+Error at import time _will_ happen on system with old version of pip and
+setuptools. Keep in mind that saying the package is Python 3 only is not a lot
+more helpful than a Syntax error. The most reasonable reason would be out of
+data pip and setuptools:
+
+
+```
+import sys
+
+if sys.version_info < (3,):
+    raise ImportError(
+    """You are running Frobulator 6.0 on Python 2
+
+Unfortunately Frobulator 6.0 and above are not compatible with Python 2
+anymore, and you still ended up with this version installed on your system.
+That's a bummer. Sorry about that. It should not have happened. Make sure you
+have pip >= 9.0 to avoid this kind of issues, as well as setuptools >= 24.2:
+
+ $ pip install pip setuptools --upgrade
+
+You have various other choices
+
+- install an older version of Frobulator:
+
+ $ pip install 'frobulator<6.0'
+
+- Upgrade your system to use Python 3.
+
+It would be great if you can figure out how this version ended up being
+installed, and try to check how to prevent that for future users.
+
+See the following url for more up to date informations:
+
+https://i.am.an/url
+
+""")
+
+```
+
+## Watch out for beta releases
+
+
+Make sure your version number match pep 440 or you will get surprises during
+beta in particular as the `sdist` and `wheel` will appear as being different
+versions, in particular sdist (during beta/rc/post) can appear with a greater
+version number than wheels. Pip thus try to install the sdist instead of the
+wheel, which have more chance of failing, in particular with pre 24.2 versions
+of setuptools.
+
+The regular expression to check for validity of pep440 can be find below:
+
+  `^([1-9]\\d*!)?(0|[1-9]\\d*)(\\.(0|[1-9]\\d*))*((a|b|rc)(0|[1-9]\\d*))?(\\.post(0|[1-9]\\d*))?(\\.dev(0|[1-9]\\d*))?`
+
+
+## fail early in setup.py
+
+Leave `setup.py` python 2 compatible and fail early. If you detect Python 2
+raise a clear error message and ask user to make sure they have pip >9.0 (or
+migrate to Python 3). You can (try to) conditionally import pip and check for
+its version but this might not be the same pip. Failing early is important to
+make sure the Python installation does not install an incompatible version.
+Otherwise user code can fail at runtime arbitrary later in the future, which can
+be a difficult to debug and fix. Get inspiration from the message of failure at
+runtime, and adapt for installation time.
+
+## Fix dependant libraries
+
+If you control dependant packages, Make sure to include conditional dependencies
+depending on the version of Python.
+
+# Non recommended mitigations
+
+This is a collection of "mitigation" or "solutions" you will find on the web
+and that you will hear about. This is an attempt to acknowledge them, and
+explain why they can't work and what are their drawbacks before you attempt to
+implement them.
+
+### Use a meta-package.
+
+It is possible to release a meta-package that has _virtually_ no code and rely
+on conditional dependency to install its actual core code on the user system.
+For example, Frob-6.0 could be a meta-package which depends on
+Frob-real-py2 on Python <3.0, and Frob-real-py3 on Python >= 3.4. While
+this approach is _doable_ this can make imports confusing.
+
+## Depend on setuptools
+
+You can mark your library as dependent on setuptools greater than 24.3 this
+will insure that during the next upgrade (when the packages drop python 2
+support) will have the right version of setuptools.
+
+Of course regardless of all the care you will take for your library to no break
+and to install only on python 2, you will likely have cases where it still end
+up being installed on incompatible versions of Python. Simply because users
+upgrades rarely and only an old version of pip or setuptools is enough to make
+the all update process broken.
+
+Plus setuptools is rarely an actual dependency of your project but a
+requirement to build wheels.
+
+
+### Multiple Sdist.
+
+Pip (used to) support a "feature" where a sdist ending in `-pyX.Y.tar.gz` would
+only be seen as compatible on Python X.Y, thus it used to be possible to
+publish multiple sdist of a package targeting various python version.
+
+Though it is not possible anymore to upload multiple sdist on PyPI. This
+solution is thus not possible.
+
+### Wheel only ?
+
+Releasing a package only using wheel for a given python version is doable, but
+this will break downstream packages that may require the original source to
+reproduce the build.
+
+# Why all that ?
+
+You might wonder why all this, it's 2016 already, so how come all these
+issues ? Python 3 has been out for 8+ years now !
+
+Well there are many reasons to this, first of all, this issue mostly affect
+libraries that are currently python 2 and Python 3 compatible at the same time.
+Many libraries have transitioned from Python 2-only to Python 2 + 3. And the
+issue of transitioning to Python 3 only is relatively recent. Technically it
+can also apply to libraries that are only stopping support for 2.6, or even are
+already Python 3 only, but are starting to stop support for earlier versions of
+Python. For example a library releasing a Python 3.4+ only version.
+
+Python 3.3 was release at the end of 2012, and was the first version to
+support (again) `u` as a prefix for Unicode string. It was one of the first
+minor version of Python 3 that saw a majority of single-source project working
+both on Python 2 and Python 3. These are the Project that will likely be
+affected by this issue.
+
+The introduction of Python 3 was chaotic, there are still strong argument both
+in Python 2 and Python 3 camps. In the one suffering the most from this are
+users. Starting with the fact that inevitably some libraries will stop support
+for Python 2 and release Python 3 only library. And that inevitably some system
+will will not be upgraded to Python 3 how can we _ensure_ that users get the
+_least_ breakage as possible ? And what are the best practices to follow.