You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
<divclass="toc-actions"><ul><li><ahref="https://github.com/pythonhealthdatascience/stars-reproduce-allen-2020/edit/main/CHANGELOG.md" class="toc-action"><iclass="bi bi-github"></i>Edit this page</a></li><li><ahref="https://github.com/pythonhealthdatascience/stars-reproduce-allen-2020/issues/new" class="toc-action"><iclass="bi empty"></i>Report an issue</a></li></ul></div></nav>
166
176
</div>
@@ -174,8 +184,32 @@ <h2 id="toc-title">On this page</h2>
174
184
<h1>Changelog</h1>
175
185
<p>All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.</p>
176
186
<p>The format is based on <ahref="https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/">Keep a Changelog</a>, and this project adheres to <ahref="https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html">Semantic Versioning</a>. Dates formatted as YYYY-MM-DD as per <ahref="https://www.iso.org/iso-8601-date-and-time-format.html">ISO standard</a>.</p>
Copy file name to clipboardexpand all lines: evaluation/badges.html
+2-2
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ <h1 class="title">Badges</h1>
233
233
<p>This page evaluates the extent to which the author-published research artefacts meet the criteria of badges related to reproducibility from various organisations and journals.</p>
<p>Exploring methods for overlaying figures. Not timed as not about reproduction of this study, but about how we are going to do this each time when reproducing.</p>
291
291
<p>Decided that it’s not helpful to do this - spend more time fiddling around with getting them to resize and overlay correctly - and that the simplest option here would be to compare by eye.</p>
<li>Remote execution/Online coding environment - Zenodo doesn’t but GitLab does. I was largely working with Zenodo as that was the archived version, but in this case, did say met criteria via GitLab. Importance of which code is chosen when there are two versions. I didn’t initially think it met criteria until checked the GitLab too. Have recommended both are referred to. But do they meet criteria if changes are made to repository after publication? After submission? For example, if we asked them to add a license.</li>
299
299
</ul>
300
300
<p>Compared my decisions for the best practice audit against those made in Monks and Harper. Don’t think I would normally plan to do this. Their GitHub is <ahref="https://github.com/TomMonks/des_sharing_lit_review">TomMonks/des_sharing_lit_review</a>, which provides the file <code>share_sim_data_extract.zip</code>. I used the provided code to clean this and saved it as <code>share_sim_data_extract_clean.csv</code>, which can then view here:</p>
Copy file name to clipboardexpand all lines: search.json
+15-1
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -200,7 +200,21 @@
200
200
"href": "CHANGELOG.html",
201
201
"title": "Changelog",
202
202
"section": "",
203
-
"text": "Changelog\nAll notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.\nThe format is based on Keep a Changelog, and this project adheres to Semantic Versioning. Dates formatted as YYYY-MM-DD as per ISO standard."
203
+
"text": "All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.\nThe format is based on Keep a Changelog, and this project adheres to Semantic Versioning. Dates formatted as YYYY-MM-DD as per ISO standard.\n\n\nRelease date: 3rd June 2024\nContributors: Amy Heather\nCompleted work on reproducing items from the agreed scope.\n\n\n\nAttempted reproduction of items from the original study.\n\n\n\n\n\nRelease date: 22nd May 2024\nContributors: Amy Heather\nDefined scope for the reproducibility assessment.\n\n\n\nBasic repository which includes a page defining the agreed scope for the reproducibility assessment."
204
+
},
205
+
{
206
+
"objectID": "CHANGELOG.html#v0.2.0",
207
+
"href": "CHANGELOG.html#v0.2.0",
208
+
"title": "Changelog",
209
+
"section": "",
210
+
"text": "Release date: 3rd June 2024\nContributors: Amy Heather\nCompleted work on reproducing items from the agreed scope.\n\n\n\nAttempted reproduction of items from the original study."
211
+
},
212
+
{
213
+
"objectID": "CHANGELOG.html#v0.1.0",
214
+
"href": "CHANGELOG.html#v0.1.0",
215
+
"title": "Changelog",
216
+
"section": "",
217
+
"text": "Release date: 22nd May 2024\nContributors: Amy Heather\nDefined scope for the reproducibility assessment.\n\n\n\nBasic repository which includes a page defining the agreed scope for the reproducibility assessment."
0 commit comments