Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Define filter for DimStack #322

Open
rafaqz opened this issue Oct 9, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Define filter for DimStack #322

rafaqz opened this issue Oct 9, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
missing base methods

Comments

@rafaqz
Copy link
Owner

rafaqz commented Oct 9, 2021

filter should work on DimStack as if it's a dataframe.
@rafaqz
Copy link
Owner Author

rafaqz commented Oct 28, 2021 •
edited
Loading

It would be good if all of these operations work but keep the array structure. Just filling the gaps with missing. Not sure how much work that is to implement.

Probably more sensible and following Base to filter as table rows. and return a Vector of NamedTuple? Or maybe a DimVector with a MergedLookup is better, but its more expensive. This would also need #483 to be nice to use, so table columns are not lost.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
missing base methods
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@rafaqz