Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Syncing latest changes from upstream master for rook #570

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

df-build-team
Copy link

PR containing the latest commits from upstream master branch

Javier and others added 6 commits January 29, 2024 19:23
This update modifies the Helm chart rook-ceph-cluster
to allow define cephStorageClass as part of the blokpool
also the documentation was updated for cephECBlockPool definition

Signed-off-by: Javier <[email protected]>
Bumps the github-dependencies group with 1 update: [github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go](https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go).


Updates `github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go` from 1.50.5 to 1.50.12
- [Release notes](https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go/releases)
- [Commits](aws/aws-sdk-go@v1.50.5...v1.50.12)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
  dependency-group: github-dependencies
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
The validation logic of checking the number of devices is
wrong when `metadataDevice` is set and `osdsPerDevice` > 1.
`len(cvReports)` is the expected number of OSDs and is
the number of specified data devices multiplied
by `osdsPerDevice`.

Closes: rook#13637

Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <[email protected]>
…ices-when-metadatadevice-is-set

osd: correct counting the devices when metadataDevice is set
Currently, when rook provisions OSDs(in the OSD prepare job), rook effectively run a
c-v command such as the following.
```console
ceph-volume lvm batch --prepare <deviceA> <deviceB> <deviceC> --db-devices <metadataDevice>
```
but c-v lvm batch only supports disk and lvm, instead of disk partitions.

We can resort to `ceph-volume lvm prepare` to implement it.

Signed-off-by: Liang Zheng <[email protected]>
…dependencies-6731b9abb2

build(deps): bump the github-dependencies group with 1 update
@df-build-team df-build-team requested a review from a team February 7, 2024 08:05
jhoblitt and others added 8 commits February 7, 2024 11:40
…ltiple-cephECStorageClass

helm: allow defining multiple cephEcStorageClass
…st-item

docs: fix CephCluster.spec.cephVersion.imagePullPolicy list item
When CPU requests and limits are assigned to a pod,
the pod will be guaranteed the requests, up to the limits.
Even if there are spare CPU cycles, the pod cannot use
them. Thus, pods can be unnecessarily denied compute
when they need to burst if the limits are set.

Therefore, it is not recommended to set CPU limits
since the CPU requests are already guaranteeing that
no pod will be starved at least for its requests.

Signed-off-by: travisn <[email protected]>
since networkFence is a cluster-based resource so that we don't need
the namespace and ownerReferences as it cause garbage-collector errors.

Signed-off-by: subhamkrai <[email protected]>
helm: Remove cpu limits from all pods
core: remove ownerRef from networkFence
osd: support create osd with metadata partition
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 9, 2024

@df-build-team: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/unit f1aa4f3 link true /test unit

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@travisn
Copy link

travisn commented Feb 9, 2024

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 9, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 9, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: df-build-team, travisn

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@travisn travisn merged commit f31b514 into master Feb 9, 2024
47 of 49 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants