|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +layout: post |
| 3 | +title: "Security advisories for Cargo (CVE-2022-36113, CVE-2022-36114)" |
| 4 | +author: The Rust Security Response WG |
| 5 | +--- |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +> This is a cross-post of [the official security advisory][advisory]. The |
| 8 | +> official advisory contains a signed version with our PGP key, as well. |
| 9 | +
|
| 10 | +[advisory]: https://groups.google.com/g/rustlang-security-announcements/c/ldvsemwk_VY |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +The Rust Security Response WG was notified that Cargo did not prevent |
| 13 | +extracting some malformed packages downloaded from alternate registries. An |
| 14 | +attacker able to upload packages to an alternate registry could fill the |
| 15 | +filesystem or corrupt arbitary files when Cargo downloaded the package. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +These issues have been assigned CVE-2022-36113 and CVE-2022-36114. The severity |
| 18 | +of these vulnerabilities is "low" for users of alternate registries. Users |
| 19 | +relying on crates.io are not affected. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +Note that **by design** Cargo allows code execution at build time, due to build |
| 22 | +scripts and procedural macros. The vulnerabilities in this advisory allow |
| 23 | +performing a subset of the possible damage in a harder to track down way. Your |
| 24 | +dependencies must still be trusted if you want to be protected from attacks, as |
| 25 | +it's possible to perform the same attacks with build scripts and procedural |
| 26 | +macros. |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +## Arbitrary file corruption (CVE-2022-36113) |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +After a package is downloaded, Cargo extracts its source code in the `~/.cargo` |
| 31 | +folder on disk, making it available to the Rust projects it builds. To record |
| 32 | +when an extraction is successfull, Cargo writes "ok" to the `.cargo-ok` file at |
| 33 | +the root of the extracted source code once it extracted all the files. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +It was discovered that Cargo allowed packages to contain a `.cargo-ok` |
| 36 | +*symbolic link*, which Cargo would extract. Then, when Cargo attempted to write |
| 37 | +"ok" into `.cargo-ok`, it would actually replace the first two bytes of the |
| 38 | +file the symlink pointed to with `ok`. This would allow an attacker to corrupt |
| 39 | +one file on the machine using Cargo to extract the package. |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +## Disk space exaustion (CVE-2022-36114) |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +It was discovered that Cargo did not limit the amount of data extracted from |
| 44 | +compressed archives. An attacker could upload to an alternate registry a |
| 45 | +specially crafted package that extracts way more data than its size (also known |
| 46 | +as a "zip bomb"), exhausting the disk space on the machine using Cargo to |
| 47 | +download the package. |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +## Affected versions |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +Both vulnerabilities are present in all versions of Cargo. Rust 1.64, to be |
| 52 | +released on September 22nd, will include fixes for both of them. |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +Since these vulnerabilities are just a more limited way to accomplish what a |
| 55 | +malicious build scripts or procedural macros can do, we decided not to publish |
| 56 | +Rust point releases backporting the security fix. Patch files for Rust 1.63.0 |
| 57 | +are available [in the wg-security-response repository][1] for people building |
| 58 | +their own toolchains. |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +## Mitigations |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +We recommend users of alternate registries to excercise care in which package |
| 63 | +they download, by only including trusted dependencies in their projects. Please |
| 64 | +note that even with these vulnerabilities fixed, by design Cargo allows |
| 65 | +arbitrary code execution at build time thanks to build scripts and procedural |
| 66 | +macros: a malicious dependency will be able to cause damage regardless of these |
| 67 | +vulnerabilities. |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +crates.io implemented server-side checks to reject these kinds of packages |
| 70 | +years ago, and there are no packages on crates.io exploiting these |
| 71 | +vulnerabilities. crates.io users still need to excercise care in choosing their |
| 72 | +dependencies though, as the same concerns about build scripts and procedural |
| 73 | +macros apply here. |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +## Acknowledgements |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +We want to thank Ori Hollander from JFrog Security Research for responsibly |
| 78 | +disclosing this to us according to the [Rust security policy][2]. |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +We also want to thank Josh Triplett for developing the fixes, Weihang Lo for |
| 81 | +developing the tests, and Pietro Albini for writing this advisory. The |
| 82 | +disclosure was coordinated by Pietro Albini and Josh Stone. |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-security-response/tree/master/patches |
| 85 | +[2]: https://www.rust-lang.org/policies/security |
0 commit comments