Skip to content

MCP: Embed the hir_id of the _awaited expression_ into DesugaringKind #413

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
1 of 3 tasks
henryboisdequin opened this issue Mar 10, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed
1 of 3 tasks
Labels
major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc major-change-accepted A major change proposal that was accepted T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team

Comments

@henryboisdequin
Copy link
Contributor

Proposal

Rust issue: rust-lang/rust#66731

This MCP proposes to embed the hir_id of a certain awaited expression into DesugaringKind. Take this code:

fn bar () -> impl futures::future::Future<Item=(), Error=()> {}

fn boo (){}

async fn foo() -> std::io::Result<()> {
    boo().await;
    bar().await;
    std::io::Result::Ok(())
}

This is the current output:

error[E0220]: associated type `Item` not found for `futures::Future`
 --> src/lib.rs:1:43
  |
1 | fn bar () -> impl futures::future::Future<Item=(), Error=()> {}
  |                                           ^^^^ associated type `Item` not found

error[E0220]: associated type `Error` not found for `futures::Future`
 --> src/lib.rs:1:52
  |
1 | fn bar () -> impl futures::future::Future<Item=(), Error=()> {}
  |                                                    ^^^^^ associated type `Error` not found

error[E0277]: `()` is not a future
 --> src/lib.rs:1:14
  |
1 | fn bar () -> impl futures::future::Future<Item=(), Error=()> {}
  |              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ `()` is not a future
  |
  = help: the trait `futures::Future` is not implemented for `()`

error[E0277]: `()` is not a future
 --> src/lib.rs:6:5
  |
6 |     boo().await;
  |     ^^^^^^^^^^^ `()` is not a future
  |
  = help: the trait `futures::Future` is not implemented for `()`
  = note: required by `futures::Future::poll`

error: aborting due to 4 previous errors

To enhance this error message, it would be helpful to mention that boo should be an async function in order to .await it. This would look something like this inside the diagnostic:

help: to `await` a function, use the `async` keyword:
3  |   async fn boo (){}

By passing the hir_id of the awaited expression into DesugaringKind like so: DesugaringKind::Await(expr.hir_id), we would be able to access the span of the awaited expression and produce the error message we are looking for. Also by having the hir_id, within the trait code we could inspect the desugaring kind even more and, in the future, make this diagnostic even more helpful.

(suggested by @nikomatsakis at this comment)

Mentors or Reviewers

Process

The main points of the Major Change Process is as follows:

  • File an issue describing the proposal.
  • A compiler team member or contributor who is knowledgeable in the area can second by writing @rustbot second.
    • Finding a "second" suffices for internal changes. If however you are proposing a new public-facing feature, such as a -C flag, then full team check-off is required.
    • Compiler team members can initiate a check-off via @rfcbot fcp merge on either the MCP or the PR.
  • Once an MCP is seconded, the Final Comment Period begins. If no objections are raised after 10 days, the MCP is considered approved.

You can read more about Major Change Proposals on forge.

Comments

This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.

@henryboisdequin henryboisdequin added T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc labels Mar 10, 2021
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 10, 2021

This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.

cc @rust-lang/compiler @rust-lang/compiler-contributors

@rustbot rustbot added the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Mar 10, 2021
@henryboisdequin henryboisdequin changed the title MCP: Embed the hir_id of the _awaited expression_ into the DesugaringKind MCP: Embed the hir_id of the _awaited expression_ into DesugaringKind Mar 10, 2021
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Mar 10, 2021

@rustbot second

@rustbot rustbot added the final-comment-period The FCP has started, most (if not all) team members are in agreement label Mar 10, 2021
@apiraino apiraino removed the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Mar 11, 2021
@apiraino
Copy link
Contributor

apiraino commented Mar 25, 2021

@rustbot label -final-comment-period +major-change-accepted

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 25, 2021

Error: The feature relabel is not enabled in this repository.
To enable it add its section in the triagebot.toml in the root of the repository.

Please let @rust-lang/release know if you're having trouble with this bot.

@apiraino apiraino added major-change-accepted A major change proposal that was accepted and removed final-comment-period The FCP has started, most (if not all) team members are in agreement labels Mar 25, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Mar 25, 2021
@apiraino apiraino removed the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Apr 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
major-change A proposal to make a major change to rustc major-change-accepted A major change proposal that was accepted T-compiler Add this label so rfcbot knows to poll the compiler team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants