Merge pull request #23 from theotherphil/hir

Copy contents of README.md from librustc/hir

Author: nikomatsakis

src/hir-lowering.md

@@ -1 +1,119 @@
 # HIR lowering
+
+The HIR -- "High-level IR" -- is the primary IR used in most of
+rustc. It is a desugared version of the "abstract syntax tree" (AST)
+that is generated after parsing, macro expansion, and name resolution
+have completed. Many parts of HIR resemble Rust surface syntax quite
+closely, with the exception that some of Rust's expression forms have
+been desugared away (as an example, `for` loops are converted into a
+`loop` and do not appear in the HIR).
+
+This chapter covers the main concepts of the HIR.
+
+### Out-of-band storage and the `Crate` type
+
+The top-level data-structure in the HIR is the `Crate`, which stores
+the contents of the crate currently being compiled (we only ever
+construct HIR for the current crate). Whereas in the AST the crate
+data structure basically just contains the root module, the HIR
+`Crate` structure contains a number of maps and other things that
+serve to organize the content of the crate for easier access.
+
+For example, the contents of individual items (e.g., modules,
+functions, traits, impls, etc) in the HIR are not immediately
+accessible in the parents. So, for example, if had a module item `foo`
+containing a function `bar()`:
+
+```
+mod foo {
+  fn bar() { }
+}
+```
+
+Then in the HIR the representation of module `foo` (the `Mod`
+stuct) would have only the **`ItemId`** `I` of `bar()`. To get the
+details of the function `bar()`, we would lookup `I` in the
+`items` map.
+
+One nice result from this representation is that one can iterate
+over all items in the crate by iterating over the key-value pairs
+in these maps (without the need to trawl through the IR in total).
+There are similar maps for things like trait items and impl items,
+as well as "bodies" (explained below).
+
+The other reason to setup the representation this way is for better
+integration with incremental compilation. This way, if you gain access
+to a `&hir::Item` (e.g. for the mod `foo`), you do not immediately
+gain access to the contents of the function `bar()`. Instead, you only
+gain access to the **id** for `bar()`, and you must invoke some
+function to lookup the contents of `bar()` given its id; this gives us
+a chance to observe that you accessed the data for `bar()` and record
+the dependency.
+
+### Identifiers in the HIR
+
+Most of the code that has to deal with things in HIR tends not to
+carry around references into the HIR, but rather to carry around
+*identifier numbers* (or just "ids"). Right now, you will find four
+sorts of identifiers in active use:
+
+- `DefId`, which primarily names "definitions" or top-level items.
+  - You can think of a `DefId` as being shorthand for a very explicit
+    and complete path, like `std::collections::HashMap`. However,
+    these paths are able to name things that are not nameable in
+    normal Rust (e.g., impls), and they also include extra information
+    about the crate (such as its version number, as two versions of
+    the same crate can co-exist).
+  - A `DefId` really consists of two parts, a `CrateNum` (which
+    identifies the crate) and a `DefIndex` (which indixes into a list
+    of items that is maintained per crate).
+- `HirId`, which combines the index of a particular item with an
+  offset within that item.
+  - the key point of a `HirId` is that it is *relative* to some item (which is named
+    via a `DefId`).
+- `BodyId`, this is an absolute identifier that refers to a specific
+  body (definition of a function or constant) in the crate. It is currently
+  effectively a "newtype'd" `NodeId`.
+- `NodeId`, which is an absolute id that identifies a single node in the HIR tree.
+  - While these are still in common use, **they are being slowly phased out**.
+  - Since they are absolute within the crate, adding a new node
+    anywhere in the tree causes the node-ids of all subsequent code in
+    the crate to change. This is terrible for incremental compilation,
+    as you can perhaps imagine.
+
+### HIR Map
+
+Most of the time when you are working with the HIR, you will do so via
+the **HIR Map**, accessible in the tcx via `tcx.hir` (and defined in
+the `hir::map` module). The HIR map contains a number of methods to
+convert between ids of various kinds and to lookup data associated
+with a HIR node.
+
+For example, if you have a `DefId`, and you would like to convert it
+to a `NodeId`, you can use `tcx.hir.as_local_node_id(def_id)`. This
+returns an `Option<NodeId>` -- this will be `None` if the def-id
+refers to something outside of the current crate (since then it has no
+HIR node), but otherwise returns `Some(n)` where `n` is the node-id of
+the definition.
+
+Similarly, you can use `tcx.hir.find(n)` to lookup the node for a
+`NodeId`. This returns a `Option<Node<'tcx>>`, where `Node` is an enum
+defined in the map; by matching on this you can find out what sort of
+node the node-id referred to and also get a pointer to the data
+itself. Often, you know what sort of node `n` is -- e.g., if you know
+that `n` must be some HIR expression, you can do
+`tcx.hir.expect_expr(n)`, which will extract and return the
+`&hir::Expr`, panicking if `n` is not in fact an expression.
+
+Finally, you can use the HIR map to find the parents of nodes, via
+calls like `tcx.hir.get_parent_node(n)`.
+
+### HIR Bodies
+
+A **body** represents some kind of executable code, such as the body
+of a function/closure or the definition of a constant. Bodies are
+associated with an **owner**, which is typically some kind of item
+(e.g., a `fn()` or `const`), but could also be a closure expression
+(e.g., `|x, y| x + y`). You can use the HIR map to find the body
+associated with a given def-id (`maybe_body_owned_by()`) or to find
+the owner of a body (`body_owner_def_id()`).