Skip to content

CDNs throwing data off? #7

@tomByrer

Description

@tomByrer

Third party CDNs can serve a cached, more local, thus faster, copy of a website. wouldn't Wouldn't that make your data inaccurate, since it would be random what sites are hosted + are CDN cached, while other sites don't use a CDN?

For example, for a client I was planning to add CloudFlare to their Weebly site. To do so, I would switch their DNS record from Weebly's IP to CloudFlare, then CloudFlare would request Weebly. IIRC, the first few requests through 1 of CloudFlare's 100+ POPs would have to request a new copy since it wasn't cached, but subsequent visits would be faster via the closer POP.
But not all Weebly's traffic runs though ClouldFlare. Likely few will. But likely a larger percentage of GoDaddy's WordPress admins would use a CDN, that could skew numbers in that direction, even if Weebly's raw hosting stats are faster.

You could test for CloudFlare via their cf-cache-status &/or cf-ray headers. But there are many more CDNs out there, a few CDNs a friend tests are here.

Note: It could be possible that ALL traffic for a particular host. Or CDNs are atomically available at higher tiers. Or someone configured their site to use an Image CDN, Google Fonts, & jsDelivr for JavaScript plugins....

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions