Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the pretained models of Pointbert #47

Open
lulongfei-luffy opened this issue Nov 11, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

About the pretained models of Pointbert #47

lulongfei-luffy opened this issue Nov 11, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@lulongfei-luffy
Copy link

Thanks for sharing the code and pretrained models. I noticed that there are two checkpoint about pointbert,
I wonder which one was trained on objaverse.
does this pointbert_ULIP-2.pt model trained on objaverse?

@Tycho-Xue
Copy link
Collaborator

yes, it's trained on Objaverse+shapenet

@auniquesun
Copy link

auniquesun commented Jun 13, 2024

yes, it's trained on Objaverse+shapenet

@Tycho-Xue Thanks for sharing the pre-trained weights of ULIP-2. But I notice that there is huge gap between the previous version of ULIP-2 and the CVPR 2024 version of ULIP-2.

Specifically, in previous version of ULIP-2, the top-1 zero-shot acc. on ModelNet40 is 74.0%, but in the CVPR 2024 version, the acc. increases to 84.7%. I wonder what happened during this time?

I notice both the two versions use Objaverse as the pre-training set. The CVPR 2024 version seems having additional small-size ShapeNet as the pre-training dataset. Can it make such a big difference in zero-shot performance?

@auniquesun
Copy link

auniquesun commented Jun 13, 2024

Thanks for sharing the code and pretrained models. I noticed that there are two checkpoint about pointbert, I wonder which one was trained on objaverse. does this pointbert_ULIP-2.pt model trained on objaverse?

@lulongfei-luffy I think the released pointbert_ULIP-2.pt is not the newest version since according to the CVPR 2024 ULIP-2, the top-1 zero-shot acc. of ULIP-2 on ModelNet40 is 84.7%, but in previous arXiv version of ULIP-2, the top-1 zero-shot acc. on the same dataset is 74.0%, which is 10.7% absolute decreasing.

Also, I wonder what happened during this time. What an amazing increase! From 74.0% to 84.7%.

@Tycho-Xue
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @auniquesun , yeah, in the latest ULIP which is accepted by CVPR2024, I also scaled up the 3d backbone, CLIP backbones, added color, i've had this checkpoint for quite some time, just need some code changes to make it compatible with the current codebase. I'll find sometime to make the changes since it's approaching CVPR2024, I can just upload it first in case you need it urgently, it should be very straightforward to make the inference work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants