Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

halo circular velocity #248

Open
ntessore opened this issue Aug 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

halo circular velocity #248

ntessore opened this issue Aug 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
module: halos new feature New feature, such as a new model

Comments

@ntessore
Copy link
Member

ntessore commented Aug 18, 2020

Description

We require a model that assigns a circular velocity to halos of a given mass, @itrharrison has proposed the following model:
image

Inputs

  • halo virial mass
  • halo mean overdensity
  • halo redshift
  • cosmology

Outputs

  • halo virial velocity

In addition, the halo virial radius could be obtained from the same model.

References

https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1873

@ntessore ntessore added the enhancement Improvement of existing feature label Aug 18, 2020
@ntessore ntessore added module: halos new feature New feature, such as a new model and removed enhancement Improvement of existing feature labels Aug 18, 2020
@itrharrison
Copy link
Contributor

The above screenshot is a footnote in https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1873

@rrjbca
Copy link
Contributor

rrjbca commented Aug 21, 2020

Can you update the issue name, description and references to give more detail about the specific model you want to implement. Additionally, are we assuming that our existing halo mass functions e.g. Sheth-Tormen can be used to sample virial masses? And do we have/need a way to calculate the "halo mean overdensity"?

@ntessore
Copy link
Member Author

There's a number Δ_c(z) such that a region of space will start to collapse on itself if its mean overdensity is Δ_c(z) times the critical density ρ_c(z) of the universe. The collapse results in a virialised halo. The Press-Schechter formalism estimates how often the random matter field will exceed the Δ_c(z) ρ_c(z) density. So, if we assume that everything happens instantly, the mass functions do tell us the number of virialised halos at a given mass. In de Sitter space Δ_c ≈ 178 ≈ 180 but that might change a little in LCDM?

Comparisons with simulations often use a different definition of the spherical collapse with corresponding overdensities Δ = 200 (and Δ = 500 sometimes). There is a good overview on this by White (2000). So it really depends on where the model is coming from, and how sensitive it is to these details, but I think it should be fine for our purposes.

@rrjbca rrjbca linked a pull request Sep 24, 2020 that will close this issue
5 tasks
@rrjbca rrjbca removed the v0.3 hack label Oct 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
module: halos new feature New feature, such as a new model
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants