You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Placeholder for this thought in the optimization backlog.
@zach-klippenstein and I once talked about re-writing the WorkflowNode tree using compose mechanisms (and optimizations?) but the problem there (IIRC) was that we don't want to have multiple compose-node types in the same app (e.g. UI compose-nodes and then Workflow nodes).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022, 3:01 PM Stephen Edwards ***@***.***> wrote:
Placeholder for this thought in the optimization backlog.
@zach-klippenstein <https://github.com/zach-klippenstein> and I once
talked about re-writing the WorkflowNode tree using compose mechanisms
(and optimizations?) but the problem there (IIRC) was that we don't want to
have multiple compose-node types in the same app (e.g. UI compose-nodes and
then Workflow nodes).
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#665>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAOMCHJ6PRI4OT5WCCSQ4HLU3LLLJANCNFSM5OP553QA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
Placeholder for this thought in the
optimization
backlog.@zach-klippenstein and I once talked about re-writing the
WorkflowNode
tree using compose mechanisms (and optimizations?) but the problem there (IIRC) was that we don't want to have multiple compose-node types in the same app (e.g. UI compose-nodes and then Workflow nodes).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: