You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@andrewgordstewart suggested Bob could just submit a ticket for himself. Does there need to be a special case for Bob so he doesn't have to lock funds up in escrow?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think Bob could technically submit his own swap with the current protocol.
If bob wants to remove liquidity he:
Deposits funds on L2 and register a swap
Authorize a batch with his swap
Claim batch on L1
Reclaim the funds he locked in escrow on L2
This does mean that he has to lock up extra L2 funds to withdraw L1 funds. In practice we'd probably want to support a special case for Bob so he doesn't have to lock up L2 funds in escrow that he is just going to get back.
To allow Bob to satisfy L2 (https://www.notion.so/Desired-security-and-usability-properties-a07341b850274837ae48370e3e6b20e8?d=0884756d90e94183a876e574bf3d63ef#3924d381ae6f4ca68db1cee326366e5e) he needs a way to remove liquidity from L1.
@andrewgordstewart suggested Bob could just submit a ticket for himself. Does there need to be a special case for Bob so he doesn't have to lock funds up in escrow?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: