Skip to content

Commit ce93a2c

Browse files
v30.1.37
1 parent af38459 commit ce93a2c

File tree

2 files changed

+154
-0
lines changed

2 files changed

+154
-0
lines changed

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/Bug.md

Lines changed: 74 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
1+
### Bug description
2+
Clearly and concisely describe the problem (this cannot be empty).
3+
4+
### Root cause
5+
Briefly describe the root cause and analysis of the problem.
6+
If there is an internal discussion on the forum, provide the link.
7+
8+
### Solution description
9+
Describe the changes made in the code in detail for the reviewers.
10+
11+
### Reason for not identifying earlier
12+
* [ ] Guidelines not followed. If yes, provide which guideline is not followed.
13+
14+
* [ ] Guidelines not given. If yes, provide which/who need to address.
15+
Tag label `update-guideline-coreteam` or `update-guideline-productteam`.
16+
17+
* [ ] If any other reason, provide the details here.
18+
19+
### Areas tested against this fix
20+
Provide details about the areas or combinations that have been tested against this code changes.
21+
* [ ] Tested against feature matrix. [Feature matrix link](https://syncfusion.sharepoint.com/sites/EJ2ProductOwners/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?viewid=ae81c682%2D3d0f%2D462a%2Db8ec%2D7358748d489d&id=%2Fsites%2FEJ2ProductOwners%2FShared%20Documents%2FGeneral%2FFeature%20Matrix%20%2D%20Documents)
22+
* [ ] NA
23+
24+
### Is it a breaking issue?
25+
* [ ] Yes, Tag `breaking-issue`.
26+
* [ ] NO
27+
28+
If yes, provide the breaking commit details / MR here.
29+
30+
### Action taken
31+
What action did you take to avoid this in future?
32+
33+
Feature matrix document updated
34+
* [ ] Yes
35+
* [ ] NO
36+
* [ ] NA
37+
38+
Automation details - Mark `Is Automated` field as (Yes, Manual, Not Applicable) in corresponding JIRA task once the bug is automated.
39+
* [ ] BUnit, share corresponding MR.
40+
* [ ] E2E or Manual Automation using tester - Make sure all items are automated with priority before release which can be tracked in [automation dashboard](https://syncfusion.atlassian.net/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=43396).
41+
42+
If the same issue is reproduced in ej2, what will you do?
43+
* [ ] Resolved. Provide MR link.
44+
* [ ] NO. Created task to track it. Share task link.
45+
* [ ] NA
46+
47+
Is this common issue need to be addressed in the same component or on other components in our platform?
48+
* [ ] Yes - Need to check in other components, tag `needs-attention-coreteam`
49+
* [ ] No
50+
51+
### Output screenshots
52+
Post the output screenshots if an UI is affected or added due to this bug.
53+
54+
### Blazor Checklist
55+
Confirm whether this feature is ensured in both Blazor Server and WASM
56+
* [ ] NA
57+
* [ ] Yes
58+
* [ ] NO
59+
60+
Is there any new API or existing API name change?
61+
* [ ] Yes. If yes, Provide API Review task link.
62+
* [ ] NO
63+
64+
Is there any existing behavior change due to this code change?
65+
* [ ] Yes. Add `breaking-change` label.
66+
* [ ] NO
67+
68+
69+
Do the code changes cause any memory leak and performance issue? (Test only if you suspect that your code may cause problem)
70+
* [ ] Yes
71+
* [ ] NO
72+
73+
## Reviewer Checklist
74+
* [ ] All provided information are reviewed and ensured.
Lines changed: 80 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
1+
### Feature description
2+
Clearly and concisely describe the feature.
3+
4+
### Requirement and specification document.
5+
Share the JIRA task which is attached with the requirement and specification document or directly share the document.
6+
- Even for a small feature, draft a requirement and specification document and attach it in the task.
7+
8+
### API Review task
9+
Provide task link.
10+
11+
### Output screenshots
12+
Post the output screenshots if an UI is affected or added due to this feature.
13+
14+
### Feature matrix document
15+
16+
Feature matrix document updated against this feature and committed in this [common location] (https://syncfusion.sharepoint.com/sites/EJ2ProductOwners/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?viewid=ae81c682%2D3d0f%2D462a%2Db8ec%2D7358748d489d&id=%2Fsites%2FEJ2ProductOwners%2FShared%20Documents%2FGeneral%2FFeature%20Matrix%20%2D%20Documents) .
17+
* [ ] Yes
18+
* [ ] NO
19+
* [ ] NA
20+
21+
Provide the details about the areas or combinations which have been tested against this code changes.
22+
* [ ] Tested against feature matrix.
23+
24+
### Feature acceptance criteria (Test-case document)
25+
Draft the test cases in excel and attach it in the MR itself. The automation must be covered based on this positive and worst-case test-cases.
26+
27+
### Automation details
28+
Mark 'Is Automated' field as (Yes, Manual, Not Applicable) in corresponding JIRA task once the feature is automated.
29+
* [ ] BUnit, share corresponding MR.
30+
* [ ] E2E or Manual Automation using tester - Make sure all items are automated with priority before release which can be tracked in [automation dashboard](https://syncfusion.atlassian.net/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=43396).
31+
32+
### Test bed sample location
33+
Provide the test bed sample location where the code reviewers can review the new feature’s behaviors.
34+
35+
### Feature completion checklist
36+
37+
UX changes got approval if UI is added or modified?
38+
* [ ] Yes. Provide Task link.
39+
* [ ] NO
40+
* [ ] NA
41+
42+
Drafted UG for this feature?
43+
* [ ] Yes, provide MR link.
44+
* [ ] NO, provide task link.
45+
* [ ] NA
46+
47+
Content team reviewed the UI content changes.
48+
* [ ] Yes. Provide MR or Task link.
49+
* [ ] NO
50+
* [ ] NA
51+
52+
Is this the common feature which needs to be addressed in the same component or on other components in our platform?
53+
* [ ] Yes. If we need to check in other components, tag "needs-attention-coreteam"
54+
* [ ] NO
55+
56+
Is there any existing behavior change due to this code change?
57+
* [ ] Yes. If So, add `breaking-change` label.
58+
* [ ] NO
59+
60+
### Blazor Checklist
61+
Confirm whether the ensured feature is in both Blazor Server and WASM.
62+
* [ ] Yes
63+
* [ ] NO
64+
* [ ] NA
65+
66+
Do the code changes cause any memory leak and performance issue?
67+
* [ ] Yes
68+
* [ ] NO
69+
70+
## Reviewer Checklist
71+
* [ ] Reviewed feature matrix document modifications and reviewed developer testing report against the feature matrix reviewed.
72+
* [ ] Testbed sample ensured.
73+
* [ ] Coverage report checked.
74+
* [ ] Ensured the code changes meet the coding standard.
75+
* [ ] Confirming script changes made in this merge request can't be achieved in C#.
76+
77+
Created task in Blazor to synchronize if the feature is not available and applicable.
78+
* [ ] NA
79+
* [ ] Yes, task link.
80+
* [ ] NO, share reason.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)