You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks a lot for your effort on this survey paper. It saved me a lot of time.
I spotted two typos in your current arXiv version (up to 31/01/2025).
Page 4, D. Convolution Layer, 'These sucecesses are supported by studies that have shown that
perceptual distances are well modeled by deep activations
within convolutional networks [27], [80]–[82].'
Do you mean successes?
Page 11, Fig 7, No reference, Low-level Features, the reference number for FasterVQA is wrong, it is supposed to be 263 instead of 267?
A quick question: why did you mention Patch-VQ as a blind VQA method but did not refer to them in UGC datasets? They are the largest UGC dataset so far?
best,
Simon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello authors,
Thanks a lot for your effort on this survey paper. It saved me a lot of time.
I spotted two typos in your current arXiv version (up to 31/01/2025).
Page 4, D. Convolution Layer, 'These
sucecesses are supported by studies that have shown that
perceptual distances are well modeled by deep activations
within convolutional networks [27], [80]–[82].'
Do you mean successes?
Page 11, Fig 7, No reference, Low-level Features, the reference number for FasterVQA is wrong, it is supposed to be 263 instead of 267?
A quick question: why did you mention Patch-VQ as a blind VQA method but did not refer to them in UGC datasets? They are the largest UGC dataset so far?
best,
Simon
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: