I find it frustrating that certain dApps require full access to my smart account to function properly. The current signer permissions system doesn't adequately address this issue because ERC20 transfers and approvals remain unregulated. This means a dApp could theoretically transfer my USDC to itself without proper authorization, despite permission settings.
I'd like to propose an optional feature that would enable admins to review and authorize or reject transactions that signers attempt to execute. I'm prepared to develop this functionality and submit a pull request, but I wanted to first gauge your team's interest in reviewing such a contribution before proceeding.
I look forward to collaborating with you!
I find it frustrating that certain dApps require full access to my smart account to function properly. The current signer permissions system doesn't adequately address this issue because ERC20 transfers and approvals remain unregulated. This means a dApp could theoretically transfer my USDC to itself without proper authorization, despite permission settings.
I'd like to propose an optional feature that would enable admins to review and authorize or reject transactions that signers attempt to execute. I'm prepared to develop this functionality and submit a pull request, but I wanted to first gauge your team's interest in reviewing such a contribution before proceeding.
I look forward to collaborating with you!