Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revisit node selector toggle UX in GPU case #3936

Open
0oM4R opened this issue Feb 24, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Revisit node selector toggle UX in GPU case #3936

0oM4R opened this issue Feb 24, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
type_feature New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@0oM4R
Copy link
Contributor

0oM4R commented Feb 24, 2025

Which package/s are you suggesting this feature for?

Dashboard

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe

If the use toggled on the gpu option, the rentable toggle will be on, in this case, the rented nodes by the user will not be listed.

Describe the solution you'd like

toggle on the rentable, rented by me nodes
also rented by me only should toggle off the rentable nodes or we may change the name or the UX of that toggle

@0oM4R 0oM4R added the type_feature New feature or request label Feb 24, 2025
@0oM4R 0oM4R changed the title Revisist node selector toggle UX in GPU case Revisit node selector toggle UX in GPU case Feb 24, 2025
@ramezsaeed ramezsaeed moved this to Accepted in 3.16.x Feb 27, 2025
@ramezsaeed ramezsaeed modified the milestones: 2.8.0, 2.7.0 Feb 27, 2025
@ramezsaeed
Copy link
Contributor

1- the two toggles selected together when the user choose GPU.
2- remove the "Only" word.
3- must be one of the two switches enabled when the GPU is enabled.

@0oM4R 0oM4R moved this from Accepted to In Progress in 3.16.x Feb 27, 2025
@0oM4R 0oM4R self-assigned this Feb 27, 2025
@0oM4R 0oM4R moved this from In Progress to Pending Review in 3.16.x Feb 27, 2025
@0oM4R
Copy link
Contributor Author

0oM4R commented Feb 27, 2025

Work completed:
applied the new logic on the three switches, and rename the toggles as mentioned above

@0oM4R 0oM4R moved this from Pending Review to In Verification in 3.16.x Feb 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type_feature New feature or request
Projects
Status: In Verification
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants