You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think this'll complicate axis placement, but if this can be done without negatively affecting these at various radii, I'm not against this. However, I think this would be best parameterised as a margin/padding/spacing, rather than giving direct control over the radii.
That makes sense. If we parameterize this as a margin/padding/spacing, would it conflict with the plot margin defined in the theme? Or would it be appropriate to make this parameter an element within the theme itself?
I don't think the theme is available when data is being transformed, so I don't think a theme setting would make a lot of sense from a plumbing perspective. There'd be a slight semantic overlap between the spacing and the plot.margin, but I'm not too worried about this.
coord_radial()
currently hasouter.radius
hardcoded to0.8
(0.4 = 0.8/2), preventing users from adjusting the large spacing described in: #6284.If this looks good, I can submit a pull request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: