Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvements to core-level shift scripts and docs #189

Open
jtv3 opened this issue Mar 20, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Improvements to core-level shift scripts and docs #189

jtv3 opened this issue Mar 20, 2017 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@jtv3
Copy link
Collaborator

jtv3 commented Mar 20, 2017

v2.1

  1. Improve the feedback to the user from core_shift.pl
  2. More carefully document what is happening in the manual

v2.2

  1. Example exploring CLS across materials
  2. Comparisons to various delta SCF approaches
@jtv3 jtv3 added this to the v2.1 milestone Mar 20, 2017
@jtv3 jtv3 self-assigned this Mar 20, 2017
jtv3 added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2017
Added a chapter to try and lay out the justification for how core-level shifts
are determined in OCEAN, (currently chapter 7) per #189.

Added text to the tutorial on ammonium nitrate #55.
Needs a bunch more editing. Some work to make it fit well against the new
chapter on CLS.
@jtv3
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jtv3 commented Mar 24, 2017

fixes for 2.1 are merged into develop

@jtv3 jtv3 removed their assignment Mar 24, 2017
@jtv3 jtv3 modified the milestones: v2.2, v2.1 Mar 24, 2017
@dasc01 dasc01 self-assigned this Apr 5, 2017
@dasc01
Copy link
Collaborator

dasc01 commented Apr 5, 2017

what would be a good series of materials to explore CLS?

@jtv3
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jtv3 commented Apr 6, 2017

Maybe Tod's lithium compounds? Maybe just the ordered/crystalline ones w/o any MD disorder. If you can get his inputs then there wouldn't be as much set up work to get a compare with other theory.

@jtv3 jtv3 unassigned dasc01 Aug 25, 2022
@jtv3 jtv3 modified the milestones: v2.2, v3.1 Oct 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants