You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -17,6 +17,6 @@ History: (please help fill in the gaps!)
17
17
TO-DO list:
18
18
- Is the 1+1 approach used (the parabolic axes in the inertial frame drawn on the right) in any way correct or rigorous?
19
19
- Can we extend to 1+1 with a varying gravitational field (e.g. from Earth's surface to Moon's orbit)? Or with a point mass on the 1D line (a black hole)?
20
-
- Can we extend to 2+1 with a constant gravitational field? Here the parabolas can be of different shapes representing objects travelling at different speeds.
20
+
- Can we extend to 2+1 with a constant gravitational field? Here the parabolas can be of different shapes representing objects launched at different angles.
21
21
- Can we extend to 2+1 with a point mass? Perhaps by considering a single geodesic (e.g. an elliptic orbit) as a straight line and drawing the rest of the universe as a (possibly very strange) distorted grid around that geodesic?
22
22
- In which of the above can we find a warping of spacetime such that *all* inertial objects move along straight lines? (As is true with the current constant-gravity 1+1 model.)
0 commit comments