Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Considerations about other CertificateTypes? #107

Open
boaks opened this issue May 15, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Considerations about other CertificateTypes? #107

boaks opened this issue May 15, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@boaks
Copy link

boaks commented May 15, 2022

Are there considerations about supporting or not supporting other CertificateTypes than X509?

If others are intended to be used, especially RawPublicKey(2) raise the question, how the valid_time

Time, in seconds relative to the delegation certificate's notBefore value, after which the delegated credential is no longer valid.

may be handled. One idea would be to define a default value for notBefore to be used with CertificateTypes, which don't carry such a date.

I consider this mechanism very valuable in order to be able to use RawPublicKey(2) with special hardware (HSM) to protect the RFC7250/long living private keys, and use a short living private keys of the subcerts on server nodes, especially, when it gets required to scale them up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant