Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What happened to L? #234

Open
JoJoDeveloping opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

What happened to L? #234

JoJoDeveloping opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@JoJoDeveloping
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, the entire development in the L folder is commented out. This is unfortunate, since coq-library-fol relies on it, for example here:

https://github.com/uds-psl/coq-library-fol/blob/b967df481c13e0fa2336051105a9629e935c7eb8/theories/Incompleteness/epf_mu.v#L9

What is the current status of the L development? In porting to 9.0, what can we expect to still be there and what might be removed?

@mrhaandi
Copy link
Collaborator

In master the L framework is not present because it relies on strictly more than rocq-prover.
In regular releases, coming 9.0 we will work on including and maintaining it, together with further dependencies such as coq and coq-metacoq-template.

@mrhaandi
Copy link
Collaborator

@JoJoDeveloping could you point out which statements from the L framework you require.
This would also help the discussion on #227

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants