Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

coqdoc / website #92

Open
yforster opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

coqdoc / website #92

yforster opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@yforster
Copy link
Member

Currently, our coqdoc is a complete mess.

I don't know how to fix this in a good way, and it's well possible that we want to ignore the issue for now.

Alternatively, we can in a first step remove all coqdoc headings generation by replacing (** with (* everywhere in the code. In a second step, we can then add coqdoc headings in the Problem.v and Problem_undec.v files only. That way, the coqdoc toc.html file gives a good overview over the library.

Downside: For this to work well, we would have to move the Problem.v and Problem_undec.v lines in _CoqProject to be in the right order.

@fakusb
Copy link
Member

fakusb commented Nov 19, 2020

the order of files in _CoqProject has no influence on anything I know except on the coqdoc (I thought it does someting with compilation order, but that is not the case appearently). So reordering everything would be possible.

@yforster
Copy link
Member Author

@mrhaandi @DmxLarchey would you be fine with such a change?

Lots of files would have to be touched, so I'm not I can finish it today, but if it's possible it would be neat to ship the library with clean coqdoc.

@mrhaandi
Copy link
Collaborator

would you be fine with such a change?

I support it. Useful documentation is worth the effort.

@DmxLarchey
Copy link
Collaborator

Well of course I do support the effort as well but I do not think there is a need to rush to ship it with the release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants