dependents and dependencies should show fully-qualified names

[ceedubs]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

When I'm calling dependents or dependencies it's because I'm trying to track down the dependency graph of code. So even if impl is an unambiguous name within my project, it would be much more helpful to see accounts.users.createUser.impl than impl in the dependents list.

Describe the solution you'd like

Instead of seeing something like:

project/branch> dependents baseUri
 
  Dependents of: api.baseUri
  
    Terms:
  
    1. impl
  
  Tip: Try `view 1` to see the source of any numbered item in the above list.

I'd like to see something like this:

project/branch> dependents baseUri
 
  Dependents of: api.baseUri
  
    Terms:
  
    1. accounts.users.createUser.impl
  
  Tip: Try `view 1` to see the source of any numbered item in the above list.

The latter uses a fully-qualified name similar to the output of the names command.

[aryairani]

Sounds good. Just out of curiosity, what's the next step that you want the full name for?

[ceedubs]

In this case it's that I want to see if I can delete api.baseUri instead of resolving a conflicting update in it. So I want to see what this impl is all about and whether I can also delete (or remove its dependency on baseUri). I still might need to run further commands with impl, but seeing its name gives me a quick "ah yeah that thing" and I can abandon ship on deleting baseUri if I know that it's important.