|
| 1 | +- Start Date: 2020.02.01 |
| 2 | +- Target Major Version: VTU beta-0.3x/1.x |
| 3 | +- Reference Issues: |
| 4 | +- Implementation PR: |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +# Summary |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +Allows the Vue Test Utils APIs that trigger re-renders to be awaited. This makes asserting changes after re-renders easier. |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +# Basic example |
| 11 | +```js |
| 12 | + const wrapper = mount(Component) |
| 13 | + await wrapper.find('.element').trigger('click') |
| 14 | + expect(wrapper.emitted('event')).toBeTruthy() |
| 15 | +``` |
| 16 | +# Motivation |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +With the removal of `sync` mode in Vue Test Utils `beta-29`, we now need to `await` for things like watchers or the template to re-render, before we make assertions. |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +This proposal aims to make it easier for developers to work with async tests, by allowing you to `await` calls like `trigger` or those that use it internally. |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +The proposal assumes the usage of `async/await` inside tests. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +# Detailed design |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +The general idea is to return a promise resolving on `nextTick`, from actions that trigger async changes. |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +At this moment we need to manually `await` for the component to update. This leads to extra boilerplate, and is harder to grasp for beginners. |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +```js |
| 31 | + const wrapper = mount(Component) |
| 32 | + wrapper.find('.element').trigger('click') |
| 33 | + // we need to wait for the component to render |
| 34 | + await wrapper.vm.$nextTick() |
| 35 | + expect(wrapper.emitted('event')).toBeTruthy() |
| 36 | +``` |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +The new API should look like: |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +```js |
| 41 | + const wrapper = mount(Component) |
| 42 | + await wrapper.find('.element').trigger('click') |
| 43 | + expect(wrapper.emitted('event')).toBeTruthy() |
| 44 | +``` |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +With more complicated tests, the benefits are obvious: |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +```js |
| 49 | + await wrapper.find('.button').trigger('click') |
| 50 | + expect(wrapper.emitted('event')).toBeTruthy() |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | + await wrapper.find('.country-option').setValue('US') |
| 53 | + expect(wrapper.find('.state').exists()).toBe(true) |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | + await wrapper.find('.radio-option').setChecked() |
| 56 | + expect(wrapper.find('.finish').attributes('disabled')).toBeFalsy() |
| 57 | +``` |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +**Methods that should return a promise, resolving on next tick:** |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +- trigger |
| 62 | +- setValue |
| 63 | +- setChecked |
| 64 | +- setData |
| 65 | +- setProps |
| 66 | +- setSelected |
| 67 | +- setValue |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +Most of the above helpers rely on trigger internally, so updating the majority of listed methods would be easy. |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +### Additional helpers |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +Currently we have seen 3 ways to await for changes: |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +```js |
| 76 | + import flushPromises from 'flush-promises' |
| 77 | + await flushPromises() |
| 78 | + // or the more preferred |
| 79 | + await wrapper.vm.$nextTick() |
| 80 | + await Vue.nextTick() |
| 81 | +``` |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +In Vue 3 `nextTick` will be removed from the VM instance, so users will have to migrate over to importing it from Vue directly `import { nextTick } from 'vue'`. |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +A `tick` helper can be added to the VTU exports. That way users have everything in one place, and an official way to await for renders, from actions that cannot directly return a promise. |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +Such a case is triggering a custom Vue event. |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +```js |
| 90 | + import { mount, tick } from '@vue/test-utils' |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | + it('test' => { |
| 93 | + const wrapper = mount(Component) |
| 94 | + wrapper.find('.input').vm.$emit('input', 'Newly added note') |
| 95 | + await tick() |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | + expect(wrapper).toMatchSnapshot() |
| 98 | + }) |
| 99 | +``` |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +Or we could be focusing an element on mounted, which is usually done on next tick |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +```js |
| 104 | + const wrapper = mount(Component) |
| 105 | + // await data to be focused on mounted |
| 106 | + await tick() |
| 107 | + let input = wrapper.find('input').element |
| 108 | + expect(input).toBe(document.activeElement) |
| 109 | +``` |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +# Drawbacks |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +Each `trigger` will now call `nextTick()` , which I am not sure if it can hurt performance. |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +Users may try to `await` anything that interacts with the DOM, so it is a matter of writing good DOCs and guides on the topic. |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +# Alternatives |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +# Adoption strategy |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +### Vue Test Utils beta-30+ |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +Users would have to make sure `async/await` is working in their testing env. |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +Users just have to remove extra `$nextTick` and `flushPromises` calls and use the new api. |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +Improve docs on the topic. |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +### Vue Test Utils prior to beta-30 |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +Before the removal of `sync` mode it was not necessary to await for renders. |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +# Unresolved questions |
0 commit comments