-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 430
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change descripion for designers alternative text tip #748
Comments
Suggested response, this would need appropriate topping and tailing, but this is the core content: Thank you for your suggestion. Creating advice for designers on this topic is certainly challenging, and I think your approach adds important additional information and presents the task in a more realistic light. I have taken the liberty of rewording your suggestion slightly to avoid the first person reference (a stylistic choice in all other tips) and to tighten up the delivery a little. I hope you are comfortable with the suggested edits.
|
I think your reworded edit is great. Jordan's suggestion is much more designer-centric than what we have. I support this. |
Well drafted Kevin - supported :) |
I also support Kevin's approach. |
comment on potential change 61a6cae |
The approach to this was discussed in EO Meeting of 4th Dec in light of Shawn's comment. There was support for broadening the tip to address what to consider when adding non-text content to designs. There were two suggestions for changes to tip title:
These and other possible options will need to be revisited. Shawn also expressed some concern over the content. The following is a suggested rewrite that keeps to the spirit of the initial suggestion.
The example will most likely need to be revisited as well. |
Thanks Kevin. It seems to me that we are trying to convey two slightly different messages in one tip:
My hope is that (1) is at least implicitly addressed through (2), and does not need to be spelled out as directly (because it is distracting to try to say two messages in one blurb). This needs agreement from EOWG, as it is a change to the objective of the key message for this tip. If EOWG does not agree with this change, then I think we need to decide if we want (2) to be a new separate tip. In any case, my suggested rewrite for (2), which to me also implicitly addresses (1) would be this: |
+1 to Shadi's version above |
+1 from me too On 2015-12-08 10:31, shawn_slh wrote:
David Berman, RGD, FGDC LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/bermandavid Twitter @davidberman http://www.twitter.com/davidberman Facebook http://www.facebook.com/davidbberman Skype davidberman.com skype:davidberman.com?chat Google Plus High Level Advisor, United Nations | GDC ethics chair | Ico-D Sustainability chair | Carleton University Access Network chair/Accessibility courses:/ Vancouver | Victoria | Dublin | Ottawa | Toronto This message may contain proprietary information. Unauthorized disclosure/copying/distribution of contents prohibited. |
One thing to note regarding your identified 'what this tip is doing':
Of the two, if I recall, 1. is what Vicki expressed as important. Just thinking about your wording. Title I appreciate and agree with the rationale, I just can't get my head around the actual words. I think it sounds overly complex, a bit too formal, and 'provide for' has a meaning of 'feed' or 'nourish'. However, every time I try to think of an alternative I end up pushing it more towards the second message you indicated much more. So far I have tried:
Blurb I have made some minor tweaks to simplify the language a little:
Thoughts? |
Yes, (1) is the current focus and (2) is what I understand is the newly requested focus. Either EOWG accepts this change from (1) to (2), confirms that a new tip addressing (2) should be added, or declines (2) altogether. I just don't think we should mix both (1) and (2) in one tip because it is too confusing. I do not recall this decision being discussed as clearly with EOWG. That was my point. Regarding the title, I take your point. However, the three options you provide seem to speak about the alternatives themselves ("consider alternatives", "include alternatives", and "think about alternatives"), rather than the impact of visible alternatives on the design. Please work a little more on finding titles that better match (2). As to the new blurb wording, I think it looks good. It just needs a good title, then EOWG can decide if this is a suitable replacement for the current tip, or if it needs to be a new tip. |
I strongly agree not to mix 1 & 2 in a single tip. Suggestion: Design for image and media alternatives Rationale: "accommodate" can have negative connotations. Your "For example" sentence was not a complete sentence. Example? Probably we do not need an example for this. However, an idea for an example is a video with underneath it links to: Transcript and Video with audio descriptions. |
Title and wording work for me. If possible, a simple example would be helpful. I think the link to transcript idea is simple enough. Another idea would be a caption for a table or link to an inline description for a complex graph (no need to include the description - just the link is crucial). |
Just to capture the possible examples from above:
These examples may benefit from a 'good' and 'bad' version to highlight the difference. |
Discussed in [EO Meeting of 11 Dec 2015](http://www.w3.org/2015/12/11-eo-minutes.html)
I still don’t like that a very specific tip is transformed to something that is much less specific. I especially think that the innuendos here provide too much overload for people who are getting started:
I think a lot of people would just throw in the towel and say “How am I supposed to know when alternatives for images are needed? Do I need visible links to transcripts of audio or other stuff? Where is that explained to me? I am just starting out!” I feel strongly that we should revert to the original tip and provide an additional tip when we decide that we want to cover other kinds of text alternatives. And then provide hands-on suggestions for those. |
I do see your point... however, I think most of these tips are that way. That is, for pretty much all of these Tips, I think you need to follow the links to learn more. Unlike Easy Checks where we provide all the info you need, these Tips just provide a brief intro then you have to follow the links to really figure out what you need to do. I do like that this focuses specifically on the designing task, whereas the previous tip overlapped a lot with writing & developing tasks. I do think we need to consider if we now need to link to additional info about other alternatives. All the media SC seem like too much but maybe we link to http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/media-equiv.html |
I agree with, at very least, linking to link to http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/media-equiv.html . |
|
* Aim is to give more indication that this is not concerned with providing the alternative, but to provide space for it within the design
EOWG minutes of 18th Dec (starting at "Brent: Getting Started Tips") |
[mild] wording & punctuation suggestion: |
Comments on the Example
|
[mild] wording and punctuation suggestion: |
@James-Green: That looks like a Safari bug to me, if I reset the vertical-align value in the Web inspector, the AD symbol is positioned correctly… Needs investigation. goes opens another issue |
This is a residual comment from a since published resource, if there is no more discussion, please close. |
Comment received from Jordan Wilson [email protected].
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: