-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
align functionality between wis2box-api (transform) and wis2box-management (publish) #572
Comments
Proposal: wis2box-api:
wis2box-management:
|
Note: need to prepare a benchmark to compare impact of performance of moving data-transformation to API |
we discussed a sensible default for cleaning up jobs in a cronjob: DELETE request on all successfully completed jobs older than one hour |
the message sent by the wis2box-api requesting data publication is defined by https://github.com/wmo-im/wis2box/wiki/PubSubInternalMessageBusSpec |
@tomkralidis to review wis2box-api and wis2box PRs on 19 January |
I had to rebase PR wis2box-api:wis2box-1.0b7 to match latest commit on main I noted that on main we use the latest version of pywis-topics and wcmp when building the image: https://github.com/wmo-im/pywis-topics/archive/main.zip @tomkralidis Could we pin these to specific versions instead ? |
Yes, release tags will be put forth when we release (they are unpinned during a development cycle). |
2023-02-13: @tomkralidis to review wmo-im/wis2box-api#45 (job cleanup/management) |
2024-03-05
|
The latest version of wis2box is using 'wis2box-1.0b6'-branch of the wis2box-api to allow us to implement the synop-form in the wis2box-webapp.
We need to review the workflow in wis2box to allow us to move back to using the wis2box-api:main branch. The current situation should not be maintained as we end up having to align code in multiple places.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: