Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reviewer 1: FAIR principles concern #57

Open
ypriverol opened this issue Feb 9, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Reviewer 1: FAIR principles concern #57

ypriverol opened this issue Feb 9, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ypriverol
Copy link
Owner

The topic of interoperability seems nearly entirely absent in the manuscript. A text search for “interop” yields only 3 hits and 2 are just the definition of FAIR, and then last just an offhand remark. It would seem that interoperability is key topic that should be addressed in the manuscript. Should proteomics software support standards? Are ad-hoc TSV or JSON formats okay/good/better? I am startled to find no mention of the PSI or mzML or any such attempts (useful or not) to provide data formats, guidelines, and other standards whose stated goal is to enable interoperability of software. How common is the thought “well, this newly published software tool seems nice, but it does not interoperate with the input/output of my toolchain, so what value is it?” How can the field make progress with that problem? I think the manuscript should be enhanced to address this aspect.

I will take care of this. @ypriverol

@ypriverol ypriverol self-assigned this Feb 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant