Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Cacher la progression dans les campagnes de Type EXAM (Pix-16921) #11595

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 7, 2025

Conversation

xav-car
Copy link
Contributor

@xav-car xav-car commented Mar 7, 2025

🥞 Problème

La progression se base sur les ke de l'utilisateur, or en mode EXAM nous n'enrichissons pas son compte de ke. ce qui fausse totalement le contenu de la progression

🥓 Proposition

Le cacher, et ne pas faire les appel API permettant de calculer la progression dans le cas d'une campagne de type EXAM

🧃 Remarques

Front déjà fait, il manquait un test

😋 Pour tester

CI au vert. et vérifier qu'une campagne de mode Exam avec une participation non finit. la progression ne s'affiche pas.

@xav-car xav-car self-assigned this Mar 7, 2025
@pix-bot-github
Copy link

Une fois les applications déployées, elles seront accessibles via les liens suivants :

Les variables d'environnement seront accessibles via les liens suivants :

@xav-car xav-car force-pushed the pix-16921/hide-progression-on-exam branch from db93cc3 to d3efa94 Compare March 7, 2025 10:15
@xav-car xav-car marked this pull request as ready for review March 7, 2025 10:20
@xav-car xav-car requested a review from a team as a code owner March 7, 2025 10:20
@xav-car xav-car added 👀 Tech Review Needed 👀 Func Review Needed Need PO validation for this functionally and removed Development in progress labels Mar 7, 2025
const campaignAssessmentParticipation =
await campaignAssessmentParticipationRepository.getByCampaignIdAndCampaignParticipationId({
campaignId,
campaignParticipationId,
buildProgression: campaign.isTypeAssessment,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thought j'aime pas trop ça. mais c'est le plus simple sans entrer dans un refacto drift glissage inter galactique 🤐

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

juste j'aime bien quand les booleéns ils ont des noms de booléens. shouldBuildProgression ?

@xav-car xav-car force-pushed the pix-16921/hide-progression-on-exam branch from d3efa94 to f6cd105 Compare March 7, 2025 10:50
@xav-car xav-car force-pushed the pix-16921/hide-progression-on-exam branch from f6cd105 to 0de3478 Compare March 7, 2025 13:03
@laura-bergoens laura-bergoens added Tech Review OK 🚀 Ready to Merge Func Review OK PO validated functionally the PR and removed 👀 Tech Review Needed 👀 Func Review Needed Need PO validation for this functionally labels Mar 7, 2025
@pix-service-auto-merge pix-service-auto-merge force-pushed the pix-16921/hide-progression-on-exam branch from 0de3478 to 4b0cdf3 Compare March 7, 2025 13:46
@pix-service-auto-merge pix-service-auto-merge merged commit 7bbb639 into dev Mar 7, 2025
7 of 11 checks passed
@pix-service-auto-merge pix-service-auto-merge deleted the pix-16921/hide-progression-on-exam branch March 7, 2025 13:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants