Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[action] [PR:21070] [sonic-mgmt-docker-image] Support ptf dataplane packet poll with multiple ptf nn agents connection #535

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

Why I did it

When testing sonic with ptf dataplane connecting multiple ptf nn agents, some cases will fail because of packets queue in ptf were not polled thoroughly. This is a bug or missing feature in ptf: p4lang/ptf#207
as a short term quick fix, this PR will patch the ptf-py3 package and unblock our qualification process.

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

Support poll all devices in ptf dataplane.

How to verify it

Run tests using ptf dataplane on testbed

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

…iple ptf nn agents connection

<!--
     Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines:
     https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

     ** Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` **

     If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or
     "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx"

     Please provide the following information:
-->

#### Why I did it
When testing sonic with ptf dataplane connecting multiple ptf nn agents, some cases will fail because of packets queue in ptf were not polled thoroughly. This is a bug or missing feature in ptf: p4lang/ptf#207
as a short term quick fix, this PR will patch the ptf-py3 package and unblock our qualification process.
##### Work item tracking
- Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:

#### How I did it
Support poll all devices in ptf dataplane.

#### How to verify it
Run tests using ptf dataplane on testbed

<!--
If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012.
-->

#### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

<!--
- Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features!
- Please also provide a reason for the backporting below.
- e.g.
- [x] 202006
-->

- [ ] 201811
- [ ] 201911
- [ ] 202006
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202106
- [ ] 202111
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202211
- [ ] 202305

#### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

<!--
- Please provide tested image version
- e.g.
- [x] 20201231.100
-->

- [ ] <!-- image version 1 -->
- [ ] <!-- image version 2 -->

#### Description for the changelog
<!--
Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this
pull request for inclusion in the changelog:
-->

<!--
 Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.
-->

#### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
<!--
Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model
is defined
Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md
-->

#### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original PR: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#21070

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@r12f
Copy link

r12f commented Jan 23, 2025

Pipeline is broken and PR is validated in sonic-net side. Urgent PR and low risk to merge. Merging with bypassing checks.

@r12f r12f merged commit e95a415 into Azure:202412 Jan 23, 2025
9 of 20 checks passed
yutongzhang-microsoft pushed a commit to yutongzhang-microsoft/sonic-buildimage-msft that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2025
…D automatically (#20957)

#### Why I did it
src/sonic-platform-daemons
```
* 57f0448 - (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) [lag_id] Add lagid to free_list when LC absent for 30 minutes (Azure#542) (9 hours ago) [Marty Y. Lok]
* 3624cb7 - [stormond] Added new dynamic field 'last_sync_time' to STATE_DB (Azure#535) (21 hours ago) [Ashwin Srinivasan]
* 0431fa3 - Addition of DPU Chassis for thermalctld (Azure#564) (24 hours ago) [Gagan Punathil Ellath]
```
#### How I did it
#### How to verify it
#### Description for the changelog
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants