-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prefix method #329
Prefix method #329
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #329 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 93.18% 93.18%
=======================================
Files 50 50
Lines 528 528
=======================================
Hits 492 492
Misses 36 36 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Added a prefix for |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like it will work. Quite a bit of boiler plate here and its unclear to me right now how we will put these different scenarios in our overall dagger framework to compute efficiently?
Mapping across scenarios activates the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree with the push back. This is good to go for now. I see its pointing at main but really is built on another PR so will need to be careful when merging in
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Simple PR that closes #328