fix: Incorrect circuit output from combinational analysis (#468) #480
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@harikrishna-au has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe changes modify the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CA as CombinationalAnalysis.vue
participant DB as drawCombinationalAnalysis
User->>CA: Request circuit generation
CA->>CA: Call generateBooleanTableData()
CA-->>CA: Process table rows (using forEach, refined last column handling)
CA->>CA: Call generateCircuit()
alt Output value exists
CA->>DB: drawCombinationalAnalysis(data, output)
else Output is null
CA->>DB: drawCombinationalAnalysis(data, default)
end
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
❌ Deploy Preview for circuitverse failed.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
v0/src/components/DialogBox/CombinationalAnalysis.vue (1)
718-721: 💡 Verification agent🧩 Analysis chain
Track and resolve output.value issues.
The comments indicate known issues with
output.valuenull checks. These should be properly tracked and resolved.Let's verify the extent of these issues:
Would you like me to:
- Create an issue to track these output.value problems?
- Propose a comprehensive fix for the null check issues?
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all usages of output.value to identify potential issues rg "output\.value.*null" -A 3Length of output: 6123
Action Required: Resolve
output.valueNull-check IssuesWe've observed several instances where the null-checks for
output.valueare failing, as indicated by the inline comment “output.value == null not working” and repeated patterns in the following files:
src/components/DialogBox/CombinationalAnalysis.vuev0/src/components/DialogBox/CombinationalAnalysis.vuev1/src/components/DialogBox/CombinationalAnalysis.vuePlease track these issues—consider creating an issue ticket—and work on a comprehensive fix to ensure that the null checks on
output.valuefunction as intended. Would you like assistance in creating a tracking issue or further guidance in proposing a unified solution for these conditions?
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
v0/src/components/DialogBox/CombinationalAnalysis.vue (2)
299-299: Add type annotations to remaining function parameters.While some functions have been updated with TypeScript type annotations, consider adding type annotations to all function parameters for consistency and improved type safety.
-function generateBooleanTableData(outputListNames) { +function generateBooleanTableData(outputListNames: string[]): Record<string, { x: string[], 1: string[], 0: string[] }> { -function generateCircuit() { +function generateCircuit(): void {Also applies to: 640-640
665-679: Improve null check handling in circuit generation.The current implementation uses a simple null check, but could benefit from more explicit handling of edge cases.
- if (output.value == null) { + if (!output.value || output.value.length === 0) { drawCombinationalAnalysis( minimizedCircuit, inputListNames.value, outputListNames.value, globalScope ) } else { + if (!outputListNames.value) { + console.error('Output list names are missing'); + return; + } drawCombinationalAnalysis( minimizedCircuit, inputListNames.value, [`${outputListNames.value}`], globalScope ) }
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes #468
@Arnabdaz @JoshVarga @arkokoley @arkokoley
Summary by CodeRabbit