Skip to content

Add workflow for test automation #511

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rugvedkadu06
Copy link

@rugvedkadu06 rugvedkadu06 commented Mar 7, 2025

  • Added a workflow to automate running test cases for the Vue simulator.
  • The workflow sets up Node.js, installs dependencies, and executes all test cases in src/simulator/spec using Vitest.
  • Ensures tests run on every push and pull request to the main branch.
  • Helps maintain code quality by detecting issues early.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Introduced an automated test run that validates unit tests during code updates.
  • Chores
    • Updated a key styling dependency to a more stable version.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow that automates running Vitest tests for the project. The workflow is triggered on pushes and pull requests to the main branch, sets up an Ubuntu environment with Node.js v18, checks out the repository, installs dependencies, and runs the specified unit tests. Additionally, the version of the sass dependency in the project's package.json file has been downgraded from ^1.77.6 to ^1.63.6, updating the project's development dependencies.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/run-tests.yml Added a new GitHub Actions workflow to automate Vitest test cases (checkout, setup Node.js, install dependencies, run tests).
package.json Downgraded the sass dependency version in devDependencies from ^1.77.6 to ^1.63.6.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant GitHub as GitHub Actions
    participant Repo as Repository
    participant Node as Node Environment

    GitHub->>Repo: Checkout Code (actions/checkout)
    GitHub->>Node: Setup Node.js v18 (actions/setup-node)
    Node->>Node: Install Dependencies (npm install)
    GitHub->>Node: Run Vitest Tests (npm run test:unit)
Loading

Poem

I'm hopping fast through CI fields,
With tests that run and yield,
My paws click on code so neat,
As Node and tests happily meet,
Sass took a step down in version lore,
I'm the rabbit cheering for more!
🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Deploy Preview for circuitverse ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 3db803a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/circuitverse/deploys/67cb142a665d180007674d2f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-511--circuitverse.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2a9f309 and 3db803a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/run-tests.yml (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - circuitverse
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - circuitverse
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - circuitverse
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

62-62: Verify Dependency Version Downgrade for SASS.
The sass dependency was downgraded from ^1.77.6 to ^1.63.6. Please confirm that this change is intentional and that the older version meets all expected styling and build requirements without introducing regressions.

Comment on lines +28 to +29
- name: Run Vitest Tests
run: npm run test:unit -- src/simulator/spec
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Clarify Test Script Consistency.
The workflow step uses npm run test:unit -- src/simulator/spec, but the package.json only defines a test script (i.e., "test": "vitest"). To avoid potential runtime errors, please either update the workflow command to use npm run test -- src/simulator/spec or add a corresponding test:unit script in the package.json.


Action Required: Align Test Script Invocation with Package.json
The workflow step in .github/workflows/run-tests.yml (lines 28-29) calls

npm run test:unit -- src/simulator/spec

but the package.json only defines the "test": "vitest" script. This discrepancy can lead to runtime errors. To resolve this, please either update the workflow step to use:

npm run test -- src/simulator/spec

or add a corresponding "test:unit" script in the package.json if a separate behavior is desired.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the "scripts" section in package.json to verify if a "test:unit" script is defined.
jq ".scripts" package.json

Length of output: 431


Align Test Script Command with Package Configuration
The workflow step in .github/workflows/run-tests.yml currently runs:

npm run test:unit -- src/simulator/spec

However, as confirmed by the output from jq on package.json, there is only a test script defined ("test": "vitest"). To avoid runtime errors, please either update the workflow command to:

npm run test -- src/simulator/spec

or add a corresponding "test:unit" script in your package.json.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant