use base upward
#342
Merged
use base upward
#342
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
Needs updating of the |
drsk0
requested review from
Copilot and
limemloh
and removed request for
Copilot
allanbrondum
reviewed
Oct 8, 2025
drsk0
force-pushed
the
cor_1941_use_base_upward
branch
from
cf9c1c8 to
c41d87f
Compare
drsk0
force-pushed
the
cor_1941_use_base_upward
branch
from
c41d87f to
b47f755
Compare
limemloh
approved these changes
Oct 13, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
This removes the
upwardmodule from the sdk and instead uses the definition ofUpwardprovided by concordium-base.