-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
[AMCC-160] Tidy metric_filterlist field
#43577
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
| // NumItems returns the number of items in our matcher list. | ||
| // Used for tests. | ||
| func (m *Matcher) NumItems() int { | ||
| return len(m.data) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🥜 nitpick: if it's only used for tests it might be best to move it to a file with the test build tag, to prevent any use outside of tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would there be any advantage to doing that? I can't see anything outside of a test using it, but there wouldn't be a problem if something else did find it useful..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't have context on how this is used, I just saw the comment Used for tests., so I figured in that case we should statically enforce that it can only be used for tests
Otherwise we might as well remove the comment 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah that's fair...
Static quality checks✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
|
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: ed88b88 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.15 | [-3.08, +2.78] | 1 | Logs |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +3.33 | [+1.88, +4.78] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +2.41 | [+2.29, +2.52] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_logs | memory utilization | +0.39 | [+0.32, +0.46] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.29 | [+0.24, +0.33] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_delta | memory utilization | +0.28 | [+0.07, +0.48] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.27 | [+0.22, +0.32] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders | memory utilization | +0.20 | [+0.15, +0.25] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics | memory utilization | +0.17 | [-0.03, +0.37] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics | memory utilization | +0.16 | [+0.02, +0.30] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.06 | [-0.34, +0.47] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.05 | [-0.00, +0.10] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.08, +0.08] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | docker_containers_memory | memory utilization | -0.00 | [-0.09, +0.09] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.14, +0.13] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.14, +0.11] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.06, +0.03] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.04 | [-0.41, +0.34] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.06 | [-0.46, +0.35] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.15 | [-3.08, +2.78] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative | memory utilization | -0.25 | [-0.40, -0.11] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter | memory utilization | -0.36 | [-0.59, -0.12] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_logs | memory utilization | -0.59 | [-0.68, -0.49] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory utilization | -1.19 | [-1.38, -0.99] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | docker_containers_cpu | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_memory | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_memory | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | cpu_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
What does this PR do?
Tidies up the code a bit from #43454.
Motivation
A better way to utilise configuration layers to handle updating the
metric_filterlistfield, both from the config (when set via the olderstatsd_metric_blocklistfield) and via RC.If the field is renamed from
statsd_metric_blocklist, this setting will be overriden with an empty list and copied into themetric_filterlistfield in themodel.SourceAgentRuntimeconfig layer.Any updates from RC are added to the
model.SourceRClayer. If an empty list is received from RC, then the settings are just Unset at this layer, restoring to the previously set values.Describe how you validated your changes
I have added extra unit tests to ensure it works.
Additional Notes
There is a deadlock fix in Viper here. I believe @hush-hush will be submitting that in a separate PR before this will be merged..