Skip to content

Conversation

@sdavtaker
Copy link
Member

@sdavtaker sdavtaker commented Aug 6, 2025

  • Adopting SPDX-tools for parsing SBOMs

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • Feature / Major Change / Refactor / Optimization
  • Bug Fix
  • Documentation Update

Description

Please replace this section with a description of your changes.

Related tickets & Documents

  • Approved RFC (for feature/major changes) #
  • Related Issue #
  • Closes #

How to reproduce and testing

@sdavtaker sdavtaker force-pushed the damian.vicino/enabling-spdx-parsing branch from c59905e to 657494c Compare August 6, 2025 16:58
@sdavtaker sdavtaker force-pushed the damian.vicino/enabling-spdx-parsing branch 7 times, most recently from 200825f to cf1dcff Compare October 30, 2025 20:29
@sdavtaker sdavtaker force-pushed the damian.vicino/enabling-spdx-parsing branch 2 times, most recently from da713d2 to 9a75774 Compare November 7, 2025 19:42
@sdavtaker sdavtaker force-pushed the damian.vicino/enabling-spdx-parsing branch 2 times, most recently from 9712f14 to 7ea85bc Compare November 9, 2025 03:49
@sdavtaker
Copy link
Member Author

Holding, there is significant conflicts between dependencies after spdx breaking change in 0.8.0 that cannot be solved in all platforms without manual C building part of them.

@sdavtaker sdavtaker changed the title Adding SPDX-tools for SPDX-sbom parsing Adopting SPDX-tools for SPDX-sbom parsing Nov 27, 2025
@sdavtaker sdavtaker force-pushed the damian.vicino/enabling-spdx-parsing branch 2 times, most recently from ea7027e to 319fb96 Compare November 27, 2025 17:36
@sdavtaker sdavtaker force-pushed the damian.vicino/enabling-spdx-parsing branch from 319fb96 to a54ee31 Compare November 27, 2025 18:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants