chore: bump bytecode pin

[P403n1x87]

Description

We bump the dependency pin on bytecode to ensure that the version with all the most recent fixes is installed alongside ddtrace. We also include regression tests for the fix we are bringing in with the new version.

[brettlangdon]

Fix and release note?

Seems might be ok without, since folks should start to pick up the new bytecode version, but we do add fail safe handling here too

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2]

 

✨ Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 10 Pipeline jobs failed

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py | build linux serverless: [amd64, cp315-cp315, v113741238-d2b8243-manylinux2014_x86_64, 1]     

See error

Dependency manager download failed: invalid directive in requirements file caused by 'bytecode==0.18.1'.

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py | build linux serverless: [amd64, cp315-cp315, v113741491-d2b8243-musllinux_1_2_x86_64, 1]     

See error

NotImplementedError: This version of CPython is not supported yet during ddtrace import.

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-py | build linux serverless: [arm64, cp315-cp315, v113741357-d2b8243-manylinux2014_aarch64, 1]     

See error

NotImplementedError: This version of CPython is not supported yet while importing ddtrace.

View all 10 failed jobs.

ℹ️ Info

No other issues found (see more)

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🔄 Datadog auto-retried 1 job - 1 passed on retry

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 2c82ef9 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

Codeowners resolved as

scripts/integration_registry/registry.yaml                              @DataDog/apm-core-python @DataDog/apm-idm-python
supported_versions_output.json                                          @DataDog/apm-core-python @DataDog/apm-idm-python
supported_versions_table.csv                                            @DataDog/apm-core-python @DataDog/apm-idm-python

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-06-04 11:32:19

Comparing candidate commit 2c82ef9 in PR branch chore/bump-bytecode-pin with baseline commit 8bbc564 in branch main.

Found 0 performance improvements and 5 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 617 metrics, 10 unstable metrics.

scenario:iastaspects-index_aspect

• 🟥 execution_time [+19.913µs; +23.518µs] or [+16.141%; +19.063%]

scenario:iastaspects-title_aspect

• 🟥 execution_time [+46.374µs; +52.380µs] or [+14.067%; +15.888%]

scenario:iastaspectsospath-ospathbasename_aspect

• 🟥 execution_time [+111.218µs; +118.684µs] or [+25.996%; +27.741%]

scenario:span-start

• 🟥 execution_time [+1.144ms; +1.294ms] or [+7.330%; +8.292%]

scenario:telemetryaddmetric-1-count-metric-1-times

• 🟥 execution_time [+163.542ns; +201.537ns] or [+7.710%; +9.502%]

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: de50caf8f1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[emmettbutler]

Makes sense I suppose