-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: update readme files #4
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several enhancements to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit 528bd26. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution ✅ Successfully ran 1 targetSent with 💌 from NxCloud. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
README.md (1)
Plugin name inconsistency found in configuration examples
There are inconsistencies in how the plugin is referenced across the configuration examples:
- Flat config uses
rxjs
as plugin name- Legacy config uses
@smarttools/rxjs
as plugin name- Rule references vary between
rxjs/no-async-subscribe
and@smarttools/rxjs/no-async-subscribe
These inconsistencies should be unified to use the same plugin name format throughout the documentation.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
21-89
: Verify plugin naming consistencyThe installation and configuration examples look good, but let's verify the consistency of plugin names used throughout the examples.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check consistency of plugin names in configuration examples # Look for inconsistencies in plugin names rg -U "(?:@smarttools/(?:eslint-plugin-)?rxjs|rxjs)" README.mdLength of output: 9100
packages/eslint-plugin-rxjs/README.md (1)
Line range hint
26-89
: Clear and comprehensive configuration examples!The documentation effectively covers both Flat Config and Legacy Config patterns with clear examples.
Consider adding comments in the code examples to indicate where users should add their specific parser options, as you've used the placeholder
// parserOptions here
in some examples but not all.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.md
(1 hunks)packages/eslint-plugin-rxjs/README.md
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
README.md (4)
Line range hint 7-19
: Documentation structure improvements look great!
The clear separation between Flat Config and Legacy Config, along with the improved organization of sections, makes the documentation more user-friendly and easier to navigate.
Line range hint 1-136
: Documentation improvements are excellent!
The changes significantly enhance the documentation's clarity and usability through:
- Clear badge additions for project status
- Well-structured configuration examples for both Flat and Legacy configs
- Improved rules table format with clear indicators for recommended rules and fixers
3-5
: Verify badge URLs are functional
The badge additions look good, but let's verify the URLs are correct and functional.
✅ Verification successful
Badge URLs are correctly configured and functional
All badge URLs are properly formatted and resolve successfully with HTTP 200 status codes:
- NPM version badge URL with encoded package name
- GitHub Actions CI badge URL with correct workflow path
- MIT license badge (standard shields.io URL)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify badge URLs resolve correctly
# Check if NPM badge URL resolves
curl -s -I "https://img.shields.io/npm/v/%40smarttools%2Feslint-plugin-rxjs" | head -n 1
# Check if CI badge URL resolves
curl -s -I "https://github.com/DaveMBush/eslint-plugin-rxjs/actions/workflows/ci.yml/badge.svg" | head -n 1
Length of output: 221
Line range hint 91-136
: Verify rule documentation links
The rules table is well-formatted and improves readability. Let's verify that all rule documentation links are valid.
✅ Verification successful
All rule documentation links are valid and accessible
All documentation links in the rules table return HTTP 200 status codes, indicating they are valid and accessible. The table provides accurate references to the rule documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify rule documentation links
# Extract and check documentation links
rg -o 'https://github\.com/DaveMBush/eslint-plugin-rxjs/blob/main/packages/eslint-plugin-rxjs/docs/rules/[^)]+' README.md | while read -r url; do
curl -s -I "$url" | head -n 1
done
Length of output: 6730
packages/eslint-plugin-rxjs/README.md (4)
3-5
: Great addition of status badges!
The added badges (NPM version, license, and CI status) provide valuable metadata about the project status and follow open source best practices.
Line range hint 7-24
: Well-structured introduction and installation guide!
The documentation clearly explains:
- The upgrade from the original plugin
- Support for modern TypeScript and ESLint configurations
- Complete installation steps including prerequisites
Line range hint 91-133
: Excellent rules documentation format!
The table format with symbols (✅ for recommended, 🔧 for fixers) provides a clear and scannable overview of all available rules. The links to detailed documentation for each rule enhance usability.
Line range hint 1-133
: Overall excellent documentation update!
This README update successfully:
- Adds informative badges
- Clarifies modern ESLint configuration support
- Provides comprehensive installation and setup instructions
- Presents rules in a clear, well-organized table format
The changes make the documentation more user-friendly and maintainable.
Issue Number: #3
Body
Update readme files with badges
Summary by CodeRabbit
README.md
with new badges for NPM version and CI status.