Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unify cfsr and gefs datm datamodes #300

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 5, 2025

Conversation

NickSzapiro-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes

Code for cfsr and gefs datm datamodes is very similar (just with different function names). This PR removes the duplicates. As gefs datm datamode is already in ESCOMP/CDEPS, gefs is retained here. Note that GFS, GEFS, CFSR, etc. input datasets are still handled via streams in the same way, just with datamode == 'GEFS'.

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any:

CDEPS Issues Fixed (include github issue #): NOAA-EMC#64

Are there dependencies on other component PRs (if so list):

Are changes expected to change answers (bfb, different to roundoff, more substantial): bfb

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes): Remove cfsr datm datamodes. Use gefs instead

Testing performed (e.g. aux_cdeps, CESM prealpha, etc): UFS regression test suite

Hashes used for testing: See ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#2389

Copy link
Contributor

@jedwards4b jedwards4b left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@jedwards4b
Copy link
Contributor

@NickSzapiro-NOAA Does this still need to go in? If so please fix the merge conflicts and I'll try to take care of it right away. Sorry it wasn't handled in a timely manner.

@NickSzapiro-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jedwards4b This has been updated to top of main

@jedwards4b jedwards4b merged commit bb29e46 into ESCOMP:main Mar 5, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants