Skip to content

Update FoodsController.cs #27

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

iamcymentho
Copy link

Description:

I refactored the GetAllFoods controller method to achieve a cleaner and more maintainable codebase. Business logic for retrieving food items, creating pagination metadata, and building links has been moved to the FoodService class, adhering to the Single Responsibility Principle. This separation of concerns enhances code organization and readability.

The Response.Headers.Add("X-Pagination", ...) line is retained in the controller, as it directly modifies the response headers. This change helps maintain a clear distinction between controller and service responsibilities.

Issue:

This commit addresses and aligns with best practices for structuring .NET Web API applications. The separation of concerns ensures a more modular and testable codebase.

Description:

Refactors the GetAllFoods controller method to achieve a cleaner and more maintainable codebase. Business logic for retrieving food items, creating pagination metadata, and building links has been moved to the FoodService class, adhering to the Single Responsibility Principle. This separation of concerns enhances code organization and readability.

The Response.Headers.Add("X-Pagination", ...) line is retained in the controller, as it directly modifies the response headers. This change helps maintain a clear distinction between controller and service responsibilities.

Issue:

[Include the issue number or reference, if applicable]

This commit addresses the issue [Insert Issue Number or Reference] and aligns with best practices for structuring .NET Web API applications. The separation of concerns ensures a more modular and testable codebase.
@FabianGosebrink
Copy link
Owner

Hey, thanks for the changes. Can you please make one PR which is buildable and deployable instead of different PRs which are not buildable and testable on their own? Thanks :)

@iamcymentho
Copy link
Author

Hello @FabianGosebrink ,

Thank you for your valuable feedback on consolidating the changes into one PR for better testability and deployment. I have created this single PR, as suggested, to encompass both structural improvements and upcoming code cleanup.

The foremost goal in this PR was to address the structural issues within the solution. Upon closer inspection, I found that the existing solution needed significant restructuring to align with Clean Architecture principles. I took the initiative to reorganize it into distinct layers - API, Data, Domain, and Service. This restructured foundation sets the stage for a more maintainable and scalable codebase, making it easier to implement enhancements in the future.

With these structural changes in place, the upcoming cleanup of the FoodController, as initially discussed, will be more straightforward. This approach ensures that we start with a solid architectural foundation.

I appreciate your ongoing support and look forward to your feedback on the comprehensive changes made to the codebase.

@iamcymentho
Copy link
Author

Hello @FabianGosebrink ,

I hope you're well. I wanted to check in regarding the pull request I submitted. The changes in the PR include significant structural improvements to the codebase, which were essential to align it with Clean Architecture principles. This foundational work paves the way for a more maintainable and scalable codebase.

Once this PR is reviewed and merged, I'm eager to proceed with the code cleanup in the FoodController, which will enhance the code's readability and maintainability.

Your feedback on the current PR is invaluable, and I'd greatly appreciate it if you could take some time to review it. Your insights will help us move forward with further improvements.

Thank you for your time, and I look forward to your feedback.

@FabianGosebrink
Copy link
Owner

Hey, thanks for your stunning work, your kindness and your perfect communication. I will review when I find time and get back to you. Thanks!

@iamcymentho
Copy link
Author

You're very welcome! @FabianGosebrink I'm glad to hear you're satisfied with the work and communication. Take your time with the review, and if you have any feedback, please feel free to reach out. I'm here to help. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you!

@iamcymentho
Copy link
Author

@FabianGosebrink Its a new year and I'm still yet to hear back from you . I would say this project should have been fully done and dusted by now . Care to reach out?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants